SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ARUN MONGA, J.
Krishan Joshi S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4285 of 2024
Decided on : 09-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Swati Shekhar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtyar Khan, P.P.

IMPORTANT POINT
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining legal continuity and protecting the rights of the parties involved.

Headnote:

SAVINGS CLAUSE - FAIR INVESTIGATION - BNSS 531(2)(a), Cr.P.C. 482 - The court discussed the savings clause under Section 531(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the old Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) are governed by the provisions of the Cr.P.C. The court emphasized the importance of this clause in maintaining legal continuity and protecting the rights of parties involved in ongoing proceedings. The interpretation of this clause influenced the court's decision to treat the petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. rather than the new BNSS.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking a fair investigation into FIR No. 0068/2024, registered on 02.02.2024, for alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC. The petitioner claimed that the investigation was not being conducted properly, despite the FIR being registered regarding a dispute over agricultural land purchased by his late father.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the investigation was still ongoing and that the investigating officer was acting cautiously due to related civil litigation. The court held that the petitioner should have pursued other legal remedies before approaching the court directly.

Issues: Whether the petition for a fair investigation should be treated under the new BNSS or the old Cr.P.C., and whether the investigation was being conducted fairly.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS mandates that ongoing investigations initiated before the new law's enactment must continue under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. The court emphasized the need for legal continuity and the protection of rights established under the old law.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the direction that the petitioner could approach the appropriate legal forums for redressal if necessary, as the investigation was still underway.

Judgement Key Points

Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.


ORDER :

ARUN MONGA, J.

1. Head Note of the petition herein reads as under:

    “S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS FOR FAIR, IMPARTIAL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION IN FIR NO.0068/2024 DATED 02.02.2024 POLICE STATION NOKHA DISTRICT BIKANER FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 420, 120-B IPC.”

2. A perusal of the above clearly reveals that the FIR was registered on 02.02.2024 i.e. prior to coming into force of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) with effect from 01.07.2024.

3. In the premise, in view of the savings clause contained under section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS, the petition ought to have been filed under the old corresponding Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, (Cr.P.C.), and not under section 528 of the new Code (BNSS).

4. For ready reference, the entire Section 531 of BNSS is reproduced hereinbelow:

    “531. Repeal and savings-

(1). The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) is hereby repealed.

(2). Notwithstanding such repeal—

(a). if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974), as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhita had not come into force;

(b). all notifications published, proclamations issued, powers conferred, forms provided by rules local jurisdictions defined, sentences passed and orders, rules and appointments, not being appointments as Special Magistrates, made under the said Code and which are in force immediately before the commencement of this Sanhita, shall be deemed, respectively, to have been published, issued, conferred, specified, defined, passed or made under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita;

(c) any sanction accorded or consent given under the said Code in pursuance of which no proceeding was commenced under that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita and proceedings may be commenced under this Sanhita in pursuance of such sanction of consent;

(3). Where the period specified for an application or other proceeding under the said Code had expired on or before the commencement of this Sanhita, nothing in this Sanhita shall be construed as enabling any such application to be made or proceeding to be commenced under this Sanhita by reason only of the fact that a longer period therefor is specified by this Sanhita or provisions are made in this Sanhita for the extension of time.”

(Emphasis supplied)

5. We are concerned here only with the savings clause contained in sub section 531(2)(a), ibid. A perusal thereof clearly reflect that, not only the pending trial/appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of the BNSS, shall have to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Cr.P.C., 1973 and not under the BNSS, 2023.

6. The reasons for the same are not far too seek. What has to be been seen simply is the date of registration of the FIR and the law as applicable as on the date of such registration. Trite it may sound, but settled position is that, the moment an FIR is registered under section 154 of the Cr.P.C., criminal investigative/administrative machinery is set in motion under Chapter XII thereof. Thus, if an FIR is registered prior to 01.07.2023 under the Cr.P.C., it would amount to a pending enquiry/investigation within the meaning of section 531(2)(a) of BNSS. The entire subsequent investigation procedure and even the trial procedure qua such an FIR shall then be governed by Cr.P.C. and not BNSS.

6.1. Let us analyze it deeper by dwelling further on it. Legislative processes often involve simultaneous twin actions i.e. not only the creation of new law, but also the repe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top