IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ARUN MONGA, J.
Krishan Joshi S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4285 of 2024
Decided on : 09-07-2024
SAVINGS CLAUSE - FAIR INVESTIGATION - BNSS 531(2)(a), Cr.P.C. 482 - The court discussed the savings clause under Section 531(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the old Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) are governed by the provisions of the Cr.P.C. The court emphasized the importance of this clause in maintaining legal continuity and protecting the rights of parties involved in ongoing proceedings. The interpretation of this clause influenced the court's decision to treat the petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. rather than the new BNSS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition seeking a fair investigation into FIR No. 0068/2024, registered on 02.02.2024, for alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC. The petitioner claimed that the investigation was not being conducted properly, despite the FIR being registered regarding a dispute over agricultural land purchased by his late father.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the investigation was still ongoing and that the investigating officer was acting cautiously due to related civil litigation. The court held that the petitioner should have pursued other legal remedies before approaching the court directly.
Issues: Whether the petition for a fair investigation should be treated under the new BNSS or the old Cr.P.C., and whether the investigation was being conducted fairly.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS mandates that ongoing investigations initiated before the new law's enactment must continue under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. The court emphasized the need for legal continuity and the protection of rights established under the old law.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the direction that the petitioner could approach the appropriate legal forums for redressal if necessary, as the investigation was still underway.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.
ORDER :
ARUN MONGA, J.
1. Head Note of the petition herein reads as under:
2. A perusal of the above clearly reveals that the FIR was registered on 02.02.2024 i.e. prior to coming into force of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) with effect from 01.07.2024.
3. In the premise, in view of the savings clause contained under section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS, the petition ought to have been filed under the old corresponding Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, (Cr.P.C.), and not under section 528 of the new Code (BNSS).
4. For ready reference, the entire Section 531 of BNSS is reproduced hereinbelow:
(1). The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) is hereby repealed.
(2). Notwithstanding such repeal—
(a). if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974), as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhita had not come into force;
(b). all notifications published, proclamations issued, powers conferred, forms provided by rules local jurisdictions defined, sentences passed and orders, rules and appointments, not being appointments as Special Magistrates, made under the said Code and which are in force immediately before the commencement of this Sanhita, shall be deemed, respectively, to have been published, issued, conferred, specified, defined, passed or made under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita;
(c) any sanction accorded or consent given under the said Code in pursuance of which no proceeding was commenced under that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita and proceedings may be commenced under this Sanhita in pursuance of such sanction of consent;
(3). Where the period specified for an application or other proceeding under the said Code had expired on or before the commencement of this Sanhita, nothing in this Sanhita shall be construed as enabling any such application to be made or proceeding to be commenced under this Sanhita by reason only of the fact that a longer period therefor is specified by this Sanhita or provisions are made in this Sanhita for the extension of time.”
(Emphasis supplied)
5. We are concerned here only with the savings clause contained in sub section 531(2)(a), ibid. A perusal thereof clearly reflect that, not only the pending trial/appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of the BNSS, shall have to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Cr.P.C., 1973 and not under the BNSS, 2023.
6. The reasons for the same are not far too seek. What has to be been seen simply is the date of registration of the FIR and the law as applicable as on the date of such registration. Trite it may sound, but settled position is that, the moment an FIR is registered under section 154 of the Cr.P.C., criminal investigative/administrative machinery is set in motion under Chapter XII thereof. Thus, if an FIR is registered prior to 01.07.2023 under the Cr.P.C., it would amount to a pending enquiry/investigation within the meaning of section 531(2)(a) of BNSS. The entire subsequent investigation procedure and even the trial procedure qua such an FIR shall then be governed by Cr.P.C. and not BNSS.
6.1. Let us analyze it deeper by dwelling further on it. Legislative processes often involve simultaneous twin actions i.e. not only the creation of new law, but also the repe
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining....
(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 531(2)(a) – Not only pending trial / appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of BNSS, sha....
The court ruled that bail applications filed after the BNSS's enforcement for FIRs registered before its enactment must comply with the BNSS provisions, emphasizing the retrospective application of p....
The court established that pending matters under the CrPC, 1973, are preserved by the BNSS, 2023, while new incidents post-enactment must adhere to the BNSS.
The saving clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that pending legal proceedings initiated before its enforcement continue under the old Cr.P.C framework.
The repeal of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, effective from 01.07.2024, mandates that all new petitions must be filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The repeal of the Cr.P.C. led to the dismissal of petitions filed under it after the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, emphasizing that future filings must comply with the ne....
Crime and investigation – If any offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, then if F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of new criminal laws, then same will be registered unde....
FIRs for offences committed before new laws must be registered under IPC, with investigations following BNSS procedures.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.