IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ., SUMAN SHYAM, J.
RUPJYOTI BORAH, SON OF JUGESWAR BORAH - Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.1944 Of 2023
Decided On : 13-08-2024
Regulations - Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board - Article 309, Article 320 - The Court upheld the constitutionality of the Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board Regulations, 2021, interpreting Articles 309 and 320 of the Constitution, affirming the Governor's authority to regulate recruitment processes without mandatory consultation with the Public Service Commission.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board Regulations, 2021, and related amendments, arguing they bypassed the Public Service Commission's role in recruitment, claiming the Governor's actions were unconstitutional.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Governor acted within constitutional powers under Article 309, and the provisions of Article 320 regarding consultation with the Public Service Commission were not mandatory, thus upholding the Regulations and amendments.
Issues: Whether the Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board Regulations, 2021, and the amendments to the Assam Technical Education Service Rules, 1981, are unconstitutional for bypassing the Public Service Commission's consultation requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Governor has the authority to frame regulations under Article 309, and the requirement for consultation with the Public Service Commission under Article 320(3) is directory, not mandatory.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
[Vijay Bishnoi, CJ.] :
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. K. Gogoi and Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Education (Higher) Department and Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T.J. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel and Standing Counsel, APSC.
2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner with a prayer to grant the following reliefs:
“In the premises aforesaid, it is therefore prayer that that Your Lordship’s would be graciously pleased to admit this Writ Petition, call for the records and issue rule, calling up the Respondents to show cause as to why:
b) A Writ in the nature of Certiorari should not be issued to set aside and quashed the Assam Technical Education Services (Amendment) Rules, 2022 amended vide its notification dated 31/05/2022 issued by the Higher Education (Technical) Department, Govt. of Assam as it being ultra vires.
c) a Writ in the nature of Certiorari should not be issued to set aside and quash selection process sought to be conducted vide Advertisement No.AESRB-01/2023 AESRB-02/2023, AESRB-03/2023 and AESRB-04/2023 dated 21.02.2023 issued by the aforesaid Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board.
d) a Writ in the nature of Mandamus should not be issued directing the Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board Regulations, 2021 to for bear from conducting any recruitment to the Technical Services which APSC is empowered to conduct in terms of Assam Technical Education Service Rules, 1981.
e) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate order or directions to the respondent authorities not to bring the power of recruitment to the posts of Lecturer Technical and Non-Technical of the Govt. Polytechnics at Assam and Assistant Professor of Engineering Colleges under the AESRB.
f) And/or be pleased to pass such further order/orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. The brief facts of the case are that the Government of Assam, Department of Higher Education (Technical) started 5(five) new Polytechnic Colleges in the State of Assam and for that purpose, in March, 2021, 260 posts were sanctioned which included Principals, Head of the Departments, Lecturers (Technical and Non-Technical), Library Staff, Workshop Staff, Administrative Staff, Supporting (Teaching) Staff, Senior Instructor (Mechanical Engineering), Junior Instructor, Scientific Assistants (Physics and Chemistry) and other Grade IV staff.
4. Advertisement No.04/2022 dated 25.02.2020 was issued by the Director of Technical Education, Government of Assam, inviting applications for filling up 120 numbers of post of Lecturer (Technical), Lecturer (Non-Technical) and Senior Instructor under Regulation 3(f) of the Assam Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1951 (hereinafter to be referred as the “Regulations of 1951”) purely on ad hoc basis for a period of 4(four) months. Out of those 120 posts, 80 posts belonged to Lecturer (Technical) and 25 posts belonged to Lecturer (Non-Technical). Pursuant to the above referred advertisement, the petitioner applied for the post of Lecturer (Technical) and was appointed on ad hoc basis and thereafter, the said ad hoc appointment continued by granting extension from time to time.
5. 04.06.2022, the Assam Engineering Service Recruitment Board (hereinafter to be referred as “AESRB”) issued an advertisement No.02/2022 inviting on-line applications for filling up 80 numbers of posts of Lecturer (Technical) in different Bran
Ashok Kumar Shrivastava & Ors. -Vs- Ram Lal & Ors.
B.N. Nagarajan & Ors. –Vs- State of Karnataka & Ors.
K. Kuppusamy & Anr. –Vs- State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
AI
The Court established that the Governor can regulate recruitment processes under Article 309 without mandatory consultation with the Public Service Commission as per Article 320.
It clearly emerges that in the event the performance of ineligible candidates in the written examination, held on are taken into consideration in shortlisting the candidates for personality test/inte....
Selection process was not culminated with the appointment of candidates and at the time challenge was made, only the select list of candidates recommended by Commission was prepared and no appointmen....
(1) Constitutionality of Rules stipulating minimum qualifying marks in viva voce test as a part of selection criteria for appointment to District Judiciary in the States of Bihar and Gujarat respecti....
The recruitment process for educational posts must adhere to statutory guidelines and involve necessary bodies to ensure fairness, accountability, and non-arbitrariness as mandated under Article 320(....
The state can prescribe additional qualifications for teacher recruitment without violating central educational standards.
The reduction of chances of promotion does not constitute a variation in the condition of service, and the State Government has the authority to frame rules under the Act of 1973.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.