VIJAY BISHNOI, N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Moni Gogoi, Wife Of Sri Diganta Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.
These 2(two) writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the validity of the provisions of Rule 8, Rule 10(1) and Rule (2) of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialised Schools) Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023, (hereinafter to be referred as “the Amendment Rules of 2023”) notified on 20.09.2023 as well as the amendment brought into the Schedule-II and Schedule-III of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialised Schools) Service Rules, 2018 by way of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialised Schools) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2023, notified on 13.12.2023 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Second Amendment Rules of 2023”). The petitioners have also prayed for quashing and setting aside the Advertisement Nos.E-392562/3 and E-392562/4 dated 27.12.2023, issued by the Director of Secondary Education, Government of Assam.
2. The relevant brief facts of the cases are that the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialised Schools) Service Rules, 2018 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Rules of 2018”) were promulgated by the Hon’ble Governor of Assam in exercise of powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of In
Innoventive Industries Limited Vs. ICICI Bank & Anr.
Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Manish Kumar Vs. Union of India & Anr.
S. Satyapal Reddy & Ors. Vs. Government of A.P. & Ors.
Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr. Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
State of T.N. & Anr. Vs. S.V. Bratheep (Minor) & Ors.
State of Orissa Vs. Sudhansu Sekhar Mishra & Ors.
Basheshar Nath Vs. Commission of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan & Anr.
Somesh Thapliyal & Anr. Vs. Vice Chancellor, H.N.B. Garhwal University & Anr.
Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.
The state can prescribe additional qualifications for teacher recruitment without violating central educational standards.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of qualifications prescribed by the NCTE and the illegality of State Government amendments in contravention of statutory prov....
The omission of B.Ed. qualification for Vice-Principal recruitment violates NCTE guidelines, necessitating its inclusion as a mandatory requirement.
The judgment emphasized the limited review jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and highlighted that no vested rights could accrue to the petitioners due to an advertisement th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.