KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Management Of Assam Carbon Products Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assam Carbon Workers And Employees Union – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the dispute and settlement details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding the labour court's errors. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondents argue the binding nature of the settlement. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 4. court's assessment of jurisdiction and procedural adherence. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 5. emphasis on binding nature of settlements under the law. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 6. court's final observations on productivity norms and entitlement. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 7. final judgment and consequences of the court's decision. (Para 74 , 75 , 76) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel and Mr. A. Dasgupta, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, assisted by Ms. B. Das, learned counsel.
2. By filing this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is assailing the Award dated 25.01.2018 passed by the Labour Court, Guwahati in Reference Case No. 02/2017 published by Letter No. GLR.20/2017/2024 dated 17.02.2018.
3. The brief facts of the case are as hereunder:-
Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Science & Another Vs. Bikartan Das & Others
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Limited Vs. Workmen & Others
Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Ahmed Ishaque & Others
Herbertsons Limited Vs. Workmen of Herbertsons Limited & Ors reported in (1976) 4 SCC 736
Hochtief Gammon Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa & Others
K.M. Shanmugam -vs- The S.R.V.S (P) Ltd. and others
P. Virudhachalam & Ors Vs. Management of Lotus Mills & Another
Pottery Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Perfect Pottery Co. Limited & Another
R.M. Yellati Vs. Assistant Executive Engineer
Surya Dev Rai -vs- Ram Chandra Rai and others, reported in 2003 (6) SCC 675
The illegal refusal of employment by the management necessitated compensation for the workman, underscoring the employer's burden to prove any contrary claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act can only be considered a dispute if a specific demand has been made by the workmen, and any refere....
The termination of an employee without due process is illegal, and the burden of proof lies with the employer to substantiate claims of non-employment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Tripartite Settlement dated 23.07.2008 was binding on the workmen, and the court did not find grounds to interfere with the decision of th....
The Tribunal must conduct a thorough evidentiary analysis to justify decisions concerning wage revisions and additional allowances under the Industrial Disputes Act, ensuring all material evidence is....
The importance of evidence presented before the Labour Court, the limited scope of judicial review, and the impact of delay and suppression of material facts on the petition.
The court reaffirmed that an employer must provide procedural documentation to validate termination; absence of such leads to findings of illegal termination under the Act.
Judicial review in labour disputes is confined to procedural fairness; substantive issues not raised in original petitions cannot be reconsidered in Writ Applications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.