SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, ITANAGAR PERMANENT BENCH
Kardak Ete, J.
Shri Ippe Tachung, S/O Tamuk Tachung - Appellant
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh, through Public Prosecutor and ors. – Respondents
Crl. Appl. No. 05 (AP)/2024
Decided On : 13-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Muk Pertin, Sr. Cl. Mr. M. Yubbey
For the Respondent: Ms. L. Hage, Addl. P.P., A.P., Mr. L. Perme, Adv.

The POCSO Act allows for conviction based on the victim's testimony, provided it is credible, with burden shifting to the accused under Section 29 to prove innocence.

Headnote:(A) POCSO Act, 2012 - Section 8 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 354A and 447 - Conviction of accused for sexual assault and criminal trespass based on a complaint of molestation of an 8-year-old - Notably, the conviction holds as the victim's testimony corroborated by eyewitnesses was deemed credible - Notably, issues of the victim's age authenticity and the need for corroborative evidence raised by the defense were dismissed as the prosecution met its burden under Section 29 of the POCSO Act. (Paras 2, 3, 5, 8, 41, 60)

(B) Burden of Proof - The standard under the POCSO Act is the preponderance of probability regarding foundational facts which shift the burden of proof to the accused to demonstrate innocence. (Para 58)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from the conviction of the accused for molestation and sexual assault on the victim on 29.09.2021 as alleged in the FIR filed by the victim's mother. Evidence from the victim and witnesses collaborated the assertions made in the FIR.

Findings of Court:
The trial court found the accused guilty based on consistent testimonies corroborated by medical examination and other evidence; however, the conviction under Section 447 IPC was set aside due to lack of appropriate charges framed.

Issues: The primary issues included the credibility of the victim's testimony, the authenticity of identified documents concerning the victim's age, and proof of the incident's occurrence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that a conviction in sexual offense cases can derive from the victim's testimony when deemed credible, and the POCSO Act mandates a preponderance of proof from the prosecution.

Result: Criminal appeal dismissed, except for the conviction under Section 447 IPC which was overturned.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding evidence and investigation (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments against the credibility of the victim's testimony and evidence. (Para 14)
4. court discussions on evidentiary standards and relevance in sexual assault cases. (Para 19 , 21 , 30)
5. court’s reliance on victim’s testimony (Para 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38)
6. presumption of guilt under pocso (Para 51 , 54)
7. conclusion and dismissal of appeal (Para 63 , 64)

JUDGMENT :

Kardak Ete, J.

Heard Mr. Muk Pertin, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Yubbey, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. L. hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1 and Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2/informant.

2. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.01.2024, passed by the learned Special Judge, (POCSO), Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, in PSG SC (POCSO) Case No. 09/2021, whereby accused Shri Toli Pale, has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 (three) years 1 (one) month with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only for the offence under Section 8 of the POCSO Act and also sentenced to undergo imprisonment for period of 1 (one) month and a fine of Rs. 500/- (Rupees five hundred) only for the offence under Section 447 IPC, by holding guilty of sexual assault under Section 354A(2) IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

3. The case set up by the prosecution, in brief, is that on 01.10.2021, a written complaint was filed by one Smti Tongam Buchi before the Officer-In-Charge, Likabali Police Station alleging that Shri Toli Pale, convict herein, has molested her daughter Ms. XXX (name withheld), aged about 8 years, on 29.09.2021. Upon receipt of the said F.I.R. a case, being WPS Case No. 15/2021, under Section 354 A (i) IPC read with Section 9 of the POCSO Act was registered.

4. During investigation, the victim was examined and her statement was recorded. The victim was also forwarded to the Protection Officer, District Child Protection Unit, Pasighat for counseling. The statements of the other witnesses were also recorded. It is seen that the complaint was made at Likabali Police Station where the victim was forwarded for medical examination. MLC report was received on 06.10.2021 at WPS. The convict- Shri Toli Pale was arrested on 01.10.2021.

5. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that the victim was staying at Pasighat with her maternal aunt. On 29.09.2021, the convict, along with the guardian of the victim and one more friend, were having drinks at Sibo Korong River. Thereafter, they reached the quarter of Shri Jumto Yomgam where the victim was staying and they had drinks there again. During that time, the convict entered into the room where he hugged and kissed the victim and then inserts his hand inside lower inner garment (Panty). As per MLC report of the victim, the Medical Officer opined that the victim was sexually assaulted. The statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 02.12.2021.

6. After completion of investigation, the Charge-Sheet was laid against the accused/convict under Section 354 A (i) IPC read with Section 9 of the POCSO Act. The charges were framed on 13.04.2022 by the learned Special Judge against the accused/convict under Section 354 A (ii) read with Section 8 of POCSO Act. The charge was explained to the accused/convict to which he denied the charge and pleaded not guilty of offence and claimed to be tried.

During the course of trial, the prosecution has examined in all 7 (seven) prosecution witnesses. The learned trial court examined the accused person under section 313 Cr.PC and was recorded his statements. The defence plea is total denial. Thereafter 3 (three) defence witnesses, including the accused/convict, were examined.

7. Upon consideration of the evidence adduced on record, the learned Spec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top