SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH
(PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI)
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Suman Sharma @ Chuman Kr. Sharma, S/o. Sri Rajdeo Sharma - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by P.P. Assam and Anr. - Respondents
Crl. A. No.330 Of 2023
Decided On : 30-09-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.R. Gogoi.
For the Respondents: Mr. P.S. Lahkar, Mr. N. Barman.

The court upheld the conviction for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, establishing that harassment related to dowry demands occurred shortly before the victim's death, which was unnatural and within seven years of marriage.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304B - Death of married woman - Appellant convicted of dowry death and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 8 years for demanding dowry and subjecting the deceased to cruelty shortly before her death, which occurred within 7 years of marriage - The prosecution successfully established that the deceased was subjected to cruelty and harassment consistent with dowry demands. (Paras 26, 31, 36, 38)

(B) Presumption of Dowry Death - The court emphasized Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, noting that when a woman dies under unnatural circumstances within 7 years of marriage, the burden shifts to the accused to disprove the presumption of dowry death. (Paras 26, 28, 30)

Facts of the case:
The appellant married Nirmala Thakur in July 2010. After complaints of dowry demands and cruelty, Nirmala died on September 21, 2015, under suspicious circumstances, prompting her father to file an FIR. (Paras 4, 10)

Findings of Court:
The evidence substantiated that Nirmala suffered from physical and mental abuses, and her death was determined to be homicidal, not due to natural causes. (Paras 24, 26, 36)

Issues: The court addressed whether the prosecution proved that the appellant subjected Nirmala to harassment shortly before her death and if the statutory presumption of dowry death applied. (Paras 10, 11, 31)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the demand for dowry and associated cruelty, leading to unnatural death, warranted conviction under Section 304B, and noted the importance of statutory presumptions in such cases. (Paras 26, 28, 31)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.

Table of Content
1. court addresses the initial case facts and procedural background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments raised by the appellant challenging the conviction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. responses from the prosecution presenting evidence of dowry harassment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's examination of evidence and witness testimonies. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's interpretation of legal standards under ipc and evidence act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. final observations and summary of findings leading to verdict. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

(Robin Phukan, J.) :

Heard Mr. S.R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the accused/appellant and Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. Also heard Mr. N. Barman, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. Judgment, dated 07.08.2023, and order of sentence, dated 08.08.2023, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon, in Sessions Case No. 81/2017, is impugned in this appeal, under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned Judgment dated 07.08.2023 and the order of sentence dated 08.08.2023, the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon (“trial Court”, for short) has convicted the accused/appellant Sri Suman Sharma @ Chuman Kr. Sharma, under Section 304B IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 8 years.

4. The background facts, leading to filing of the present appeal, are briefly stated as under:

    “Sri Suman Sharma @ Chuman Kr. Sharma, accused/appellant here in got married with one Nirmala Thakur (since deceased), daughter of Kamakhya Thakur, respondent No.2 here in, on 14.07.2010. After a few days of their happy conjugal life, marital discord surfaced when the present accused/appellant started demanding dowry and subjected Nirmala Thakur to both physical and mental cruelty. She was taken to the native place of the accused/appellant at Bihar, and there the accused/appellant, along with his mother Smti Saradha Devi, Smti. Sangita Sharma, wife of Sri Chutan Sharma (the brother of the accused/appellant) subjected her to different kinds of tortures. Thereafter, she was taken back to Jagiroad where the accused/appellant has business and on 21.09.2015, the accused/appellant and his brother Chutan Sharma committed murder of Nirmala Thakur and thereafter, the father of the appellant informed the respondent No. 2 at about 12:30 p.m. that his daughter suffered demise on account of her illness.

    On receipt of an FIR to this effect from the respondent No. 2 Kamakhya Thakur, the Officer In-Charge, Jagiroad P.S. registered a case, being Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 45/2015, under Sections 304B/34 IPC and endorsed WSI Sonmoni Begum to investigate the same. The I.O. then visited the place of occurrence, examined the witnesses, arrested the accused/appellant and his brother Chutan Sharma and forwarded them to jail hazot and then she held inquest over the dead body of the deceased and sent the same for autopsy and thereafter, collected the report and on completion of investigation, the I.O. laid charge-sheet against the present appellant Suman Sharma to stand trial in the Court, under Section 304B IPC. The learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon then secured the presence of the appellant and complying with the provision of Section 2 07 , Cr.P.C., committed the case to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon, being the case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions.

    On appearance of the accused/appellant and after hearing the learned Advocates of both sides, the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon, vide order dated 18.01.2018, had framed following charges against the accused/appellant under Sections 302 /304B, IPC :-

    (i) That, you, on 21.09.2015, at about 11 am, at village Nijarapar, under jagiroad Police Station, committed dowry death by causing the death of your wife, namely, Ms. Nirmala Thakur and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 304-B IPC which is within the cognizance of this court and I hereby direct t

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top