SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Anujoy Das, S/o. Late Atiranjan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Susmita Phukan Khaund, J.
Heard Mr A Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant, and Mr K Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 09.07.2013, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhemaji, in connection with Sessions Case No. 87(DH)/2011, convicting Sri Anujoy Das (hereinafter referred as the appellant), under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) and sentencing him to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, with default stipulation, with a direction to pay the fine amount as compensation to the victim, as per provisions of Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC, for short).
3. The genesis of the case is that the minor victim who was 15 years old was kidnapped by the appellant while she came out of the house to answer nature’s call. An FIR regarding this incident was lodged by the father (also referred to as –‘Y’ or informant). Investigation commenced and after recovery of the victim (also referred to as-‘X’), she was forwarded to the Magistrate for recording her statement under Section 164 CrPC and for medical
Manirul Islam Vs. State of Assam & Another; reported in 2021 (3) GauLT 128
The prosecution must prove the victim's age and the circumstances of the alleged kidnapping beyond a reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in evidence warrant the benefit of doubt to the accused.
The court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping charges due to inconsistencies in the victim's statements and lack of evidence for coercion, emphasizing the principle of reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused kidnapped the victim with the intent to compel her to marry or to seduce her to illicit intercourse, and mere allegations without....
The court ruled that voluntary consent negates the charge of kidnapping under IPC Section 363.
Prosecution must conclusively prove the victim's age and the accused's wrongful conduct to establish kidnapping or abduction under IPC sections 363 and 366.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear and consistent evidence to establish the elements of a criminal offense, particularly regarding the age of the victim ....
Penetrative sexual assault upon minor girl – It is incumbent upon prosecution to establish beyond all reasonable doubts that victim was below 18 years as on date of occurrence to attract provisions o....
(1) Mere recovery of a child from some other person ipso facto does not to prove offence under Section 363, IPC – Prosecution has to prove that accused either took or enticed minor out of keeping of ....
Point of Law : Taking into consideration of these aspects on evidence and in absence of any documentary evidence, it can safely be said that on the date of alleged occurrence, the victim girl (PW-2) ....
The court ruled that the victim's testimony lacked credibility and corroboration, leading to the acquittal of the accused due to the benefit of doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.