SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1502

ROBIN PHUKAN
Bajaj Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Represented by the General Manager – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. D. Rathi, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. M. Chatterjee, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

(Robin Phukan, J.)

Heard Mr. D. Rathi, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Ms. M. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This miscellaneous first appeal, under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.09.2012, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in Original Application No.OA-I-6/2011.

3. The back ground facts leading to filing of the present appeal is briefly stated as under:-

    “The appellant herein is a proprietary concern/partnership firm. On 10.11.2009 by Invoice No.2/Railway Receipt No.21200273, a consignment of 40,444 bags of salt was booked from Chirai (CHIB) Junction to Dharmanagar (DMR) Station, under Railway Risk Rate, complying with the packing conditions prescribed by railways. But, there was shortage of delivery and the respondent had delivered only 38,702 bags of salt and the shortage was 1,742 bags and that the remark recorded in the railway receipt is contradictory to the remarks recorded to the forwarding station and the consignment was subjected to a criminal interference before delivery and the seal was found defective and there was also delay in transi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top