SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1617

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Charu Tach – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : Dicky Panging, Lissing Perme.

JUDGMENT :

(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.)

Heard Mr. Dicky Panging, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Lissing Perme, learned standing counsel, Department of Power, and Mr. Jambey Tsering, learned P.P., Arunachal Pradesh, appearing on behalf of their respective respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been instituted by the applicant, herein, praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities, more particularly, the Respondent No. 3 for declaration of the results of the petitioner in terms of the selection process so conducted in pursuance of an advertisement, dated 12.06.2020, for filling up of two temporary Group 'B' (Non-Gazetted) Technical Posts of Junior Engineer(Electrical) under the Meritorious Sports Persons Quota, reserved for the Arunachal Pradesh Scheduled Tribe (APST) candidates, in the establishment of the Superintending Engineer (E), Arunachal Pradesh Electrical Circle No. I-cum-Coord., Department of Power, Naharlagun.

3. The Respondent No. 3, herein, had vide the Advertisement, dated 12.06.2020, invited applications from persons fulfilling the eligibility criteria for filling up of the 2(two) posts of Junior Engineer(E) under the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top