SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Kaushik Goswami, J.
On The Death Of Loko Ram Das @ Lokeswar Das, His Legal Heir And ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Sri Tankeswar Das S/O Late Phuleswar Das and Anr – Respondents
I.A.(Civil)/2953/2024, RSA/248/2019
Decided On : 08-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R K Bhuyan, Mr. M Kashyap, Mr A Zaman
For the Respondent: Mr. N M Dutta

Substitution of legal heirs is essential for effective adjudication of appeals, ensuring continuity in legal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure - Order 22 Rule 3, Section 151 - Substitution of legal heirs - Application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased appellants was allowed for effective adjudication of the Second Appeal - Legal heirs Haren Chandra Das and Biplopjyoti Das substituted in place of deceased appellants. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Effective adjudication - The court emphasized the necessity of substituting legal heirs for the effective resolution of the appeal. (Para 3)

ORDER :

Kaushik Goswami, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R.K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. This is an application under Order 22 Rule 3, read with section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant Nos.1 and 3. It appears that during the pendency of the Regular Second Appeal, the appellant No.1 and appellant No.3 i.e. Sri Lokoram Das @ Lokeswar Das and Sri Nripen Das @ Babul Das died on 05.08.2020 and 02.04.2020 respectively leaving behind the following legal heirs, i.e. Haren Chandra Das, and Biplopjyoti Das.

3. In view of the aforesaid development, the substitution of the aforesaid legal heirs and representatives of the deceased appellant Nos. 1 and 3 appears to be essential for effective adjudication of the Second Appeal.

4. Accordingly, the prayer for substitution as sought for stands allowed. It is provided that the legal heirs of the deceased appellant Nos. 1 and 3, Haren Chandra Das and Biplopjyoti Das be substituted in place of appellant Nos. 1 and 3 respectively. Let amended Cause Title be submitted to the Registry for doing the needful.

5. The Interlocutory Application accordingly stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top