SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 127

THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J
Prafulla Nath S/o Late Sri Sangsing Nath And 23 Ors - Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India And 7 Ors - Respondent
WP(C) 721 / 2023
Decided On : 05-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: MR. R ALI, H A AHMED
For the Respondent: GA, ASSAM, MS. S PHUKAN(r-7),P. BORAH (r-7),MR. P HAZARIKA (r-7),SC, P AND R.D.,DY.S.G.I

IMPORTANT POINT
The court mandated that authorities consider petitioners for benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme in the next phase, emphasizing adherence to eligibility criteria and rectification of administrative errors.

Headnote:

(A) Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin (PMAY-G) Scheme - The petitioners, inhabitants of specific villages, claimed benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme but were denied due to misappropriation of funds and mapping errors. The Court directed authorities to consider their applications in the next phase of the PMAY-G Scheme. (Paras 3 , 8 , 9 )

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The Court emphasized the need for timely consideration of the petitioners' cases in light of the new PMAY-G Scheme phase and the importance of adhering to established criteria. (Paras 8 , 9 )

Facts of the case:

The petitioners, eligible under the PMAY-G Scheme, were not receiving benefits due to administrative errors and misappropriation of funds. They sought a directive for their inclusion in the next phase of the scheme.

Findings of Court:

The Court found that the petitioners were wrongfully excluded and directed that their cases be considered under the upcoming phase of the PMAY-G Scheme.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the non-receipt of benefits and the administrative errors leading to the exclusion of eligible beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the respondent authorities must consider the petitioners for benefits in the next phase of the PMAY-G Scheme, ensuring adherence to the criteria set forth in the relevant government letter.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

ORDER :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

Heard Mr. H.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department for the respondent nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 & 8; and Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.

2. The petitioners, twenty-four in nos., have preferred the writ petition stating that they have a common cause of action. The petitioners have stated that they are inhabitants of Village – Mikirgaon and Village – Tulshibori under Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat, District –Morigaon, Assam.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are eligible to receive the benefits of affordable housing under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin [PMAY-G] Scheme launched by the Central Government. The petitioners have further stated that they belong to economically marginal section and accordingly, their names have been included in the Socio Economic Caste Census [SECC], 2011. The respondent authorities in the Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Government of Assam had initiated a process for implementation of the PMAY-G Scheme for identification of the beneficiaries as per the SECC data and after making a survey as regards the probable beneficiaries within the territorial areas of Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat, the respondent authorities had prepared a list of probable beneficiaries, who are inhabitants of Village - Mikirgaon and Village - Tulshibori under Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat. In the said list of beneficiaries, the names of the petitioners, except the petitioner nos. 17, 18 & 23, had figured. When the petitioners were awaiting to receive the benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme, they came to learn, to their surprise, that they were not being provided with any benefits by the respondent authorities.

4. With such projections, the petitioners have preferred the instant writ petition seeking inter-alia a direction to the respondent authorities to issue sanction orders in respect of the petitioners for PMAY-G houses and to release the funds in terms of the beneficiaries list prepared for PMAY-G houses in respect of Village – Mikirgaon and Village - Tulshibori under Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat, Lahorighat Development Block, District – Morigaon.

5. An affidavit-in-opposition has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 5. In the said affidavit-in-opposition, it is stated that an enquiry was caused when anomalies were allegedly found committed in respect of the extension of benefits and in selection of beneficiaries under the PMAY-G Scheme in Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat, Lahorighat Development Block. During the enquiry, it came to light that misappropriation in respect of a Government funds meant for PMAY-G beneficiaries in Tulshibori Gaon Panchayat had occurred. It was further found during the investigation that the job cards were wrongly mapped against ID members of a number of PMAY beneficiaries, which included few of the petitioners herein, for which, the benefits were not received by those petitioners. In view of such misappropriation of Government fund, a number of Government officials involved in the matter of misappropriation and wrong mapping of job cards have already been suspended and disciplinary actions are being taken against them.

6. The prime concern of the petitioners herein is non-receipt of the benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

5. Mr. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department has submitted that the earlier version of the PMAY-G Scheme has come to an end in the meantime. But, a next phase of the PMAY-G Scheme has been envisaged and made operational with certain modifications. The next phase of PMAY-G Scheme would be carried during the period : Financial Year : 2024 – 2025 to Financial Year : 2028-2029. The Central Government, on 09.08.2024, has approved the implementation of the PMAY-G Scheme for five more years for two cror


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top