JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Mohapatra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, his clients are aggrieved by impugned letter dated 1st February, 2020 of Deputy Secretary to Government. He submits, clause II under irregularities mentioned in impugned letter says 12 beneficiaries were found ineligible as they have pucca houses of their own. He draws attention to report of enquiry made on 16th October, 2019(annexure-6). A paragraph from the report is extracted and reproduced below.

'From the random sample verification, the enquiry team comes to the conclusion that, the allegations are baseless. The beneficiary selected by the 3 member enquiry team may be considered for allotment of house under PMAY-G, 2019-20 as per guidelines.'

He submits, in the circumstances, there be interference in setting aside said clause II in impugned letter.

2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State. He submits, counter has been filed. He draws attention to paragraph 10 in it. The submission made therein is reproduced below.

'It is further humbly submitted that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opp. Parties to make verificati