Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Puspa Bhoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's eligibility for pmay scheme (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. b.d.o. acknowledges petitioner's inclusion in survey list (Para 3) |
| 3. failure to sanction house despite enrollment (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's directive to b.d.o. for timely action (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. final disposal of the writ petition (Para 8 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the B.D.O., Kantapada, Cuttack (O.P. No.3) for the sanction of a house under Rural Housing, PMAY Scheme in favour of the Petitioner, as the Petitioner is entitled to get the same as per the criterias of that PMAY scheme.
For which, the Petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition praying for directing the B.D.O., Kantapada, Cuttack (O.P. No.3) for the sanction of a house under PMAY Scheme in her favour.
“In the meantime, Government in Panchayat Raj & Drinking Water Department has issued guidelines vide letter No.19101/PR and DW, dated 21.08.2024 and as per the said guideline, a survey has been conducted and it is found that, the Petitioner eligible to enroll in the Survey list under Rural Housing Scheme and accor
Eligibility for government scheme requires timely action by authorities once established by survey enrollment.
Eligibility for housing under PMAY scheme establishes a right, necessitating action by authorities to avoid unjust delay.
A petitioner must fulfill specific documentation requirements to be eligible for housing benefits under welfare schemes.
Judicial direction for administrative compliance under welfare schemes is warranted when eligible parties are unduly delayed in receiving benefits as prescribed by government guidelines.
The court established that compliance with the PMAY(G) scheme's eligibility criteria is essential for sanctioning benefits, and the presence of valid possession certificates supports the legality of ....
The court mandated that authorities consider petitioners for benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme in the next phase, emphasizing adherence to eligibility criteria and rectification of administrative erro....
Eligibility determination under PMAY-G must adhere to prescribed guidelines; reopening inquiries based on private complaints without due process undermines applicant rights and the legitimacy of the ....
Entitlement to the benefit under the housing scheme based on verification and prescribed procedure.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
