Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Rajendra Biswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility criteria for pmay-g beneficiaries. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. state's argument on inquiry process validity. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis on inquiry legitimacy. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final order to quash invalid inquiry report. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Both the writ applications involve common questions of fact and law and being heard together are disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The petitioners are residents of Gopinathpur Gram Panchayat under Chandbali Block in Bhadrak district. They claim to be eligible for benefits under the scheme. Pursuant to the circular issued by the Director, Special Projects, a block level inquiry team was formed for each Gram Panchayat, pursuant to which a probable beneficiary list containing 291 beneficiaries of Gopinathpur Gram Panchayat was published on 16.01.2023. Objections were invited from the public from 16.01.2023 to 24.01.2023. Certain objections were received from the public regarding the inclusion of ineligible beneficiaries, for which a team formed at the block level conducted an inquiry. In the inquiry, 33 beneficiaries were found ineligible, while the remaining 258 were found eligible. T
Eligibility determination under PMAY-G must adhere to prescribed guidelines; reopening inquiries based on private complaints without due process undermines applicant rights and the legitimacy of the ....
The court mandated that authorities consider petitioners for benefits under the PMAY-G Scheme in the next phase, emphasizing adherence to eligibility criteria and rectification of administrative erro....
Eligibility for rehabilitation benefits hinges on residency status in affected areas as per established policy definitions; administrative decisions backed by valid notifications are enforceable.
Entitlement to the benefit under the housing scheme based on verification and prescribed procedure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision-making process adopted by the respondents must comply with the principles of natural justice and the statutory mandate of Section....
The court affirmed that the authorities adequately addressed the allegations of procurement violations under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if dissat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
