SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 291

MITALI THAKURIA
Mousam Paul S/o Sri Arabinda Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:MR. D CHAKRABARTY, Advocate
For the Respondent: PP, ASSAM, MR R KARIM (R-2),MS. B DEVI (R-2),MS. R GOSWAMI (R-2),MR. P K DEKA (R-2)

JUDGMENT :

MITALI THAKURIA, J.

Heard Mr. D. Chakrabarty, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1 and Mr. P. K. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. This is an application under Sections 397read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the impugned judgment dated 18.04.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Criminal Appeal No. 1/2021, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 19.01.2021, passed by the learned JMFC, Cachar, Silchar in Misc. D.V. Case No. 16/2019, was affirmed.

3. In brief, the case of the petitioner is that the respondent No. 2 herein, who is the wife of the petitioner, filed one Misc. D.V. Case No. 16/2019, under Sections 12 & 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act , 20 05 praying for relief under Sections 18 /19/20/222 of the said Act before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cachar, Silchar against the petitioner alleging domestic violence and claiming monetary relief for he


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top