THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, JJ.
Jamina Begum D/O. Tabib Ali @ Tabibar Rahman @ Tabir Ali, W/O. Nurul Hoque - Appellant
VERSUS
Union of India And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C)/7602/2018
Decided On : 10-04-2025
JUDGMENT :
Susmita Phukan Khaund, J.
Jamina Begum is the petitioner who has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order/opinion dated 10.08.2018 passed by the learned Foreigners Tribunal, Bongaigaon No.2, Abhayapuri in connection with BNGN/FT/Case No. 958/2009 whereby the petitioner was declared to be a foreigner who entered into India from Bangladesh illegally subsequent to 25.03.1971.
2. Petitioner has claimed that she is an Indian citizen born in the year 1987 at village – Madulijhar in the district of Barpeta, Assam. Her marriage was solemnized with Md. Nurul Hoque of Jaraguri No.2 village in the neighbouring district of Bongaigaon in the year 2007. She is the mother of two daughters, who are 8(Eight) years and 4 (Four) years old respectively. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s father’s name has been recorded in the NRC of 1951 as
Tubibar Rahman,
S/O - Rejan Ali,
Legacy Data Code – 120-0021-7461,
Under Village – Madulijhar,
PS – Sorbhog,
Mouza – Rupshi,
House No – 252 (ka),
District – Barpeta,
(Annexure - III).
3. The petitioner has further submitted that her grandfather’s name has been recorded as
Rejan Ali Sheikh
S/O – Jahila Sheikh in the Voters List of 1966 vide
Sl. No. – 618,
House No. – 178,
Village – Madulijhar,
Subdivision – Barpeta,
District – then Kamrup,
PS – Sorbhog,
Under then 51 No - Jania LAC
(Annexure – IV).
4. The petitioner has submitted that her grandfather’s name Rejan Ali Sheikh @ Rejan Ali @ Rejamhas been recorded as Rejan Ali in the voters list of 1970 as
S/O - Jahul,
Sl. No.– 695.
Page No.# 4/12
House No. – 178,
Village – Madulijhar,
Subdivision – Barpeta,
Dist. – then Kamrup,
PS – Sorbhog under then 51 No.Jania LAC.
(Annexure – V).
5. It is further submitted by the petitioner that her father’s name Tubibar Rahman @ Tabir Ali @ Tabib Ali has been recorded as Tabir Ali in the voters list of 1993 as
Tabir Ali in the voters list of 1993 as
S/O – Rejam,
Sl. No. – 637,
House No. – 178
Village – Madulijhar,
Sub-division – Barepta,
Dist. – Barpeta,
PS – Sorbhog.
Under then 44 No.- Jania LAC
and, her mother’s name has also been recorded in the same voters list at Sl. No. 638 as
Monowara Begum,
W/O – Tabir Ali,
(Annexure – VI).
6. The petitioner has also annexed several other voters’ lists post 1993 but to establish a link between the petitioner and her father, the voters list at Annexure – III, V and VI are sufficient. The voters list wherein the petitioner’s name has appeared for the first time as an Indian citizen eligible to vote, could establish her lineage.
7. The petitioner tried to attribute sufficient reasons relating to discrepancies in the names of the petitioner’s parents reflected in several voters’ lists. The petitioner has also drawn the attention of this Court to the certificate issued by the Headmaster of Chakchaka Government Majalia Vidyalaya, Chakchaka Bazar, marked as Annexure – IX of the petition as well as to the certificate issued by the Secretary of Madulijhar Gaon Panchayat, marked as Annexure – X.
8. It is further submitted by the petitioner that she tried to get her name enlisted in the voters list prior to publication of the list in the year 2010 but her name was not included along with the name of her husband, but her name was included for the first time in the voters list of 2013 and thereafter, in the voters list of 2016 at her parental home at village – Madulijhar, under 44 No.Jania LAC. It is further submitted that a reference was made in connection with
Musstt.Jasmina Bibi,
D/O – Md. Nuruddin Seikh,
W/O – Md. Nurul Hoque of Balajani Sibir (Jaraguri No.2),
in the year 2004.
8.1. It is further submitted that after perusal of the reference sheet (report of the Inquiry Officer), the SI (B) submitted a report on 19.03.2004 and the Inspector of Police, Border Branch, Bongaigaon affixed his signature on the report on 13.05.2004. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate as well as the Deputy Superintendent of Police (HQ), Bongaigaon affixed their signatures on 17.08.2004 and the refe
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, which must be supported by reliable evidence and proper documentation.
In citizenship proceedings, the burden of proof lies on the proceedee to establish a direct bloodline connection to an Indian ancestor. Identity documents are not conclusive proof of citizenship, and....
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
The burden of proof to establish citizenship lies on the person asserting it, requiring credible evidence of lineage and personal knowledge.
The judgment emphasizes the necessity of reliable evidence to establish citizenship claims and the burden of proof on the petitioner under the Foreigners Act, 1946.
The burden of proof lies with the petitioner to establish citizenship through credible evidence, and discrepancies in documentation can lead to a declaration of foreign nationality.
The burden of proof concerning citizenship rests with the individual asserting citizenship; insufficient evidence leads to the designation as a foreigner, reaffirming that mere document submission is....
The burden of proof for citizenship lies on the claimant, and mere inclusion in voter lists does not suffice as admissible evidence to establish citizenship.
The burden of proof under section 9 of the Foreigners' Act 1946 is on the petitioner to establish citizenship, and minor discrepancies in documents must be explained to substantiate the claim.
The burden of proof lies on the individual asserting citizenship to establish their linkage with legacy persons and provide evidence based on personal knowledge. Documentary evidence alone may not su....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.