THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Vijay Bishnoi, CJ., N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Amri Karbi Development Society And Ors. - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
PIL/80/2020
Decided On : 30-04-2025
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. M. Sarania, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned standing counsel, Revenue Department, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 4; Mr. P. Nayak, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 2 & 3; Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 5 & 6; and Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned Dy. SGI, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 7 & 8.
2. The petitioners, herein, i.e. Amri Karbi Development Society, and its Office Bearers, have instituted the present PIL petition, praying for the following reliefs:
“I. Certiorari shall not be issued directing the respondent authorities to set aside and quash the extension of the jurisdiction of the Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority and the Guwahati Municipal Corporation, to the tribal belts and blocks of Kamrup (M) and its surrounding districts, by enacting the Assam State Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2017 impugned notification issued vide No.LGL.234/2017/5 dated 25.10.2017, as illegal, null and void for being in contravention of the object and provisions of Chapter X of the ALRR, 1886;
II. Certiorari not be issued an authorities to set aside and quash the acquisition of 144 Bighas 19 Lechas of land in Damara Pathar Village Panbari Mouza, Sonapur Circle, Sub-Division Guwahati Kamrup (Metro) district by the Government of Assam vide impugned Gazette Notification No. 278 dated 29.05.2018, pertaining to L.A. Case No. 9/2011 vide impugned notification No. RLA.215/2014/89, as arbitrary and unjustified for invoking the 'urgency clause' under Section 40 of the Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, without any real emergency, in defiance of the object, intent and spirit of the Act;
III. Mandamus shall not be issued directing the respondent authorities to implementation of the protective provisions of Chapter X of the Assam Land Revenue and Regulation, 1886 pertaining to the notified Tribal Belts and Blocks within the state of Assam;
IV. Mandamus shall not be issued directing the respondent authorities to conduct a survey and mapping for correcting the land records and for returning the tribal lands to the original owners; and/or after return of the Rule and hearing of the parties, being further pleased to make the Rule Absolute giving full and complete relief to the Petitioners and/or pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. The facts requisite for adjudication of the issue as arising in the present PIL petition, is noticed as under:
The petitioner No. 1 viz. Amri Karbi Development Society, by projecting itself to be a registered Society working to protect and uplift the Amri Karbi Community residing in the State of Assam, excluding the scheduled Districts of the State, have instituted the present PIL petition, purportedly, ventilating the cause of the common people as they cannot approach the Court in their individual capacity due to financial incapacity. It is also contended in the PIL petition that the petitioners No. 2 & 3 are also the President and Secretary, respectively, of Amri Karbi National Council, which organization is projected to be involved in ventilating the grievances of the common people.
The petitioners in the present PIL petition, have, inter alia, raised grievances with regard to the formation of the “Assam State Capital Region” vide enactment of the “Assam State Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2017”. Such grievance of the petitioners is premised on the ground that the tribal belts and blocks existing in the Kamrup(Metro) District, on being included within the “Assam State Capital Region”; the protected classes of persons residing in such belts and blocks, would be denied the protections extended to them under the provisions of Chapt
Public Interest Litigations must be filed bona fide and not for personal gain; courts must ensure genuine public interest is involved.
The court upheld the validity of the Notification dated 20.07.2021, confirming that the State Government complied with the necessary provisions of Regulation 160 of the Assam Land & Revenue Regulatio....
Provisions of the Act No.30 of 2013 cannot be clubbed with the APMRUDA Act, 2016 and the Rules, 2016.
The legality of the clauses of the 3rd Bodo Accord was upheld, confirming their non-violation of constitutional rights and the legitimacy of consequential notifications regarding Bodo governance.
The court ruled that eviction without a hearing violates the principles of natural justice and Article 21 of the Constitution.
The judgment establishes the importance of preserving Satra land and emphasizes the legal provisions prohibiting the allocation of Satra land to persons of a different religion under the Assam State ....
Land Scam - 'Public Interest Litigation' – Not maintainable - PIL to be genuine Public Interest, not a publicity petition, politically motivated by third party, private interest or with any other mot....
The settlement granted to the petitioner association could not be cancelled unless found to have been contrary to the Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886.
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.