SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 907

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, JJ.
Bodo Writer Academy And Ors. - Appellant 
Vs.
Union Of India And Ors. - Respondent 
PIL No. 24 Of 2022
Decided On : 14-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR R SINGHA, MR. M GOSWAMI
For the Respondent: ASSTT.S.G.I., MR. T DEURI, INTERVENOR (R-11 to 20),SC, WPT AND BC,SC, BTC,GA, ASSAM

The legality of the clauses of the 3rd Bodo Accord was upheld, confirming their non-violation of constitutional rights and the legitimacy of consequential notifications regarding Bodo governance.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Public Interest Litigation challenging clauses of the Tri-Partite Memorandum of Settlement (3rd Bodo Accord) dated 27-01-2020 - Petitioners allege that certain clauses are ultra vires the Constitution - Court upholds that these clauses, aimed at altering the Bodoland Territorial Region (BTR), do not infringe on fundamental rights or autonomy granted under the Sixth Schedule. (Paras 2, 36, 62)

(B) Locus Standi - The Court determines that the petitioners have sufficient standing in their representative capacity concerning the Bodo community. (Paras 37, 46)

(C) Legal Interpretation - The court clarifies that clauses related to establishing a commission for territory alteration and administrational notifications do not violate the rights of the Bodo people, reinforcing the autonomy conferred by the Sixth Schedule. (Paras 52-60, 70-71)

Findings of Court:
The court finds the challenged clauses not unconstitutional and confirms the legality of notifications issued pursuant to the 3rd Bodo Accord as valid and within the jurisdiction of the government. (Paras 62, 72)

Issues: Whether the clauses of the 3rd Bodo Accord are ultra vires the Constitution and whether the notifications issued subsequent to the Accord are illegal or arbitrary?

Ratio Decidendi: The court holds that executive actions taken in accordance with the 3 Bodo Accord do not infringe upon the rights of the Bodo community and uphold the constitutional framework established for their governance.

Result: Public Interest Litigation dismissed.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Kaushik Goswami, J.

Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Goswami, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. S.R Rabha, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) and Ms. P. Baruah, learned Government Advocate for the State of Assam, Mr. R.K.D Choudhury, learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the Union of India, Mr. T. Deuri, learned Counsel appearing for the Intervenor and Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, WPT & BC appearing for respondent No. 4.

2] By filing the instant Public Interest Litigation (hereinafter referred to as “PIL”) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are praying inter alia that clause 3.1(ii), clause 3.1 (iii), clause 3.2, clause 3.3, clause 3.4, clause 4.4, clause 7.2 and clause 8.1 of the Tri-Partite Memorandum of rd Settlement (3 Bodo Accord) (hereinafter referred to as “MoS”) signed on 27.01.2020 between the Union Government of India, State Government of Assam and the leaders of ABSU, UBPO and NDFB (four factions) be declared as ultravires the Constitution of India.

3] The gamut of the case is as follows:-

The Government of India with a view to stop the violence and restore normalcy and bring about an amicable solution to the problems of the Bodo people held a series of meetings with the Government of Assam as well as with the leaders of All Bodo Students Union and Bodo People Action Committee, which finally culminated in signing of the "Bodo Accord" on 20.02.1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 1st Bodo Accord). The basic st objectives of the 1 Bodo Accord were to provide maximum autonomy within the framework of the Constitution of India to Bodos for social, economic, educational, ethnic and cultural advancement.

4] Thereafter, the Bodoland Autonomous Council Bill (hereinafter referred to as the “BAC Bill”) was introduced in the Assam State Assembly on 5th April 1993 and the said BAC Bill was enacted as Bodoland Autonomous Council Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 1993”). The said Act, 1993 provided for the establishment of a Bodoland Autonomous Council within the State of Assam with maximum autonomy within the framework of the Constitution of India.

5] During the year, 1999 when India was at war with Pakistan over the issue of Kargil, to facilitate the movement of Indian troops stationed in Bodoland to the nations north-western borders, the Bodol and Liberation Tiger (hereinafter referred to as the “BLT”) was the only underground outfit of the northeast to declare a unilateral ceasefire again during that period so that the country's sovereignty is protected.

6] In response to the ceasefire declared by BLT, the Government initiated informal talks and on 15.03.2000 declared a ceasefire from its side. On 01.05.2000, formal tripartite talks involving the Government of India, Government of Assam and the BLT commenced.

7] On 10.02.2003, the Government of India held final talks with all the major Bodo groups like ABSU, BSS, BPAC, and also the elected representatives of both the State Assembly as well the Members of Parliament and thereafter the Government of India and the Government of Assam signed the MoS with the nd BLT(hereinafter referred to as “2 Bodo Accord”). The main objectives of the 2nd Bodo Accord were to create an autonomous self-governing body to be known as Bodoland Territorial Council (hereinafter referred to as “BTC”) within the State of Assam and to administer a territory spanning 3079 villages making four coterminous districts - Kokrajhar, Chirang, Baksa and Udalguri under the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India.

8] Pertinent also that the said Act, 1993 was repealed by the Assam nd Legislative Assembly on 04.04.2003 following the signing of the 2nd Bodo Accord.

9] Pursuant to the 2 Bodo Accord, the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top