IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY, J
Bikrampur Coop Societies Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
ORDER :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the petitioner to assail an Order bearing no. GPSS.35/2001/334 dated 10.01.2022 passed by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Assam purportedly in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 49[2][l] of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 in an appeal purportedly preferred under Section 111 of the said Act by the respondent no. 4. By the impugned Order, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Assam [the respondent no. 2] has set aside an Advertisement, also published in the newspaper, inviting applications for appointing a new Secretary in a cooperative society, M/s Bikrampur Samaby Samity Ltd. and has allowed the respondent no. 4 to continue as the Secretary of M/s Bikrampur Samaby Samity Ltd. until further order.
2. The petitioner no. 1 herein is M/s Bikrampur Samaby Samity Ltd. [hereinafter referred to as ‘M/s Bikrampur Society’, for easy reference], represented by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Society, and the petitioner no. 2 is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of M/s Bikrampur Society.
3. Before proceeding further, it appears
The Deccan Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Messrs Dalichand Jugraj Jain and others
Allahabad District Cooperative Limited vs. Hanuman Dutt Tewari
Deccan Merchants Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Dalichand Jugraj Jain
Shrisht Dhawan vs. M/s Shaw Brothers
Arun Kumar and others vs. Union of India and others
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College, Shamli and others vs. Lakshmi Narain and others
Nandganj Sihori Sugar Co. Ltd., Rae Breli and another vs. Badri Nath Dixit and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.