Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Kaushik Goswami
Rajib Gogoi, S/o- Sri Jogen Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, J.
Heard Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Tarun Gogoi, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. S. Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent.
2. This application is filed under Section 401, read with Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) challenging the judgment dated 22.08.2008 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat (hereinafter referred to as the “trial Court”) in G.R. Case No. 05/2007, wherein the petitioners were convicted under Section 341/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 400/- each under Section 341 of IPC in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment for 15 days, and also Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 months each and fine of Rs. 500/- each under Section 323 of the IPC, in default of payment of fine, Simple Imprisonment for 15 days, and judgment and order dated 13.07.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 42/2008 passed by the learned Session Judge, Golaghat (hereinafter referred to as the “appellate Court”) whereby the appeal preferred by the
The court emphasized the discretionary power to grant probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering the nature of the offence and the offender's character, especially for first-time off....
(1) Benefit of probation – 1958 Act seeks to harmonize deterrence and reformation while empowering courts to release offenders after admonition or on probation of good conduct under supervision of Pr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the circumstances of the case, the na....
The court emphasized the necessity for trial courts to consider the application of probation laws for first-time offenders and the requirement to provide reasons for not applying such provisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering probation for first-time offenders and the requirement for special reasons when denying such benefits, particularly under the Probation of Offenders ....
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing probation for an offender with no prior convictions and considering age and societal behavior.
The court can extend probation benefits to offenders above 21 years under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court held that the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 applies to offenders above 21 years, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but granted probation, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for offenders above 21 years.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
