GANESH RAM MEENA
Nawal Kishore S/o Satya Narain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellants against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 26.11.1993 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, Prevention of Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes, Prevention of Atrocities, Jaipur (for short ‘the trial Court’) in Sessions Case No.88/1990, whereby, they have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| U/s. 307 IPC | (Accused appellant No.1- Nawal Kishore) | Five years Rigorous Imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo 2 months imprisonment. |
| U/s. 34 read with Section 307 IPC | (Accused appellant No.2- Rajesh) | Five years Rigorous Imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo 2 months imprisonment. |
| U/s. 323 read with Section 34 IPC | (Both accused appellants) | Fine of Rs.100/- each and in default of payment of fine each of the accused appellant has to undergo 15 days imprisonment. |
2. On filing of appeal, the sentence awarded to the accused-appellants was suspended vide order dated 13
Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Jagat Pal Singh & others vs. State of Haryana
Lakhvir Singh and Ors. Vs. The State of Punjab and Ors. (2021) 2 SCC 763
Mohd. Hashim v. State of U.P and Ors.
Mohd. Hashim Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444
Sitaram Paswan and Anr v. State of Bihar
Smt. Devki Versus State of Harayana
State of Maharashtra Versus Natwar Lal Damodar Das Soni
State of Maharashtra vs Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.