GANESH RAM MEENA
Banwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ganesh Ram Meena, J.
The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 10.06.1994 passed by the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Chhabra (Rajasthan) [for short 'the learned trial Court'] in Sessions Case No.197/1992, whereby, the accused appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| U/s. 307 I.P.C | Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/-. In default of payment of fine, the accused appellant has to further undergo two months Rigorous Imprisonment. |
2. On filing of appeal, the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant was suspended vide order dated 24.06.1994 and he was released on bail.
3. Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain, counsel appearing for the accused appellant instead of arguing the appeal on its merits with regard to challenge to the conviction and sentence, confines his arguments for grant of benefit of probation to the appellant under the provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1958'). Counsel further submits that except the present case, no case has been registered against the accused-appell
Sitaram Paswan v. State of Bihar
Smt. Devki v. State of Harayana; 1979 (3) SCC 760
State of Maharashtra v. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand; (2004) 7 SCC 659
State of Maharashtra v. Natwar Lal Damodar Das Soni 1980 (4) SCC 669
Ved Prakash v. State of Haryana
Arvind Mohan Sinha v. Amulya Kumar Biswas(1974) 4 SCC 222
Bagdawat Ram v. State of Rajasthan Criminal Appeal No. 368/1991; dated 18.05.2022
CCE v. Bahubali (1979) 2 SCC 279
Dalbir Singh v. State of Haryana
Jagat Pal Singh v. State of Haryana
The court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but granted probation, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for offenders above 21 years.
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing probation for an offender with no prior convictions and considering age and societal behavior.
The court can extend probation benefits to offenders above 21 years under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court held that the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 applies to offenders above 21 years, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court emphasized the necessity for trial courts to consider the application of probation laws for first-time offenders and the requirement to provide reasons for not applying such provisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering probation for first-time offenders and the requirement for special reasons when denying such benefits, particularly under the Probation of Offenders ....
(1) Benefit of probation – 1958 Act seeks to harmonize deterrence and reformation while empowering courts to release offenders after admonition or on probation of good conduct under supervision of Pr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.