Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA, J
Mohanlal Verma S/o Shri Maliram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp – Respondent
Order :
1. The present criminal revision petition has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 397 of CrPC assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 01.07.2004 passed by the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur (for short ‘the trial Court’) in Case No.82/1997, whereby the trial Court convicted the accused- petitioner for the offence punishable u/S 72 of the JDA Act, 1982 and sentenced him to undergo six month’ simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/-. The petitioner had further challenged the aforesaid order/judgment dated 01.07.2004 passed by the trial Court by filing a Criminal Appeal bearing No.59/2005 before the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur (for short ‘the Appellate Court’), whereby the learned Court vide order dated 01.09.2005 had reduced the sentence passed by the trial Court to one months’ simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/-.
2. On filing of this revision petition, the sentence awarded to the accused petitioner was suspended vide order dated 09.09.2005 and he was released on bail.
3. Mr. R.K. Mathur, Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the accused petitione
The court held that the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 applies to offenders above 21 years, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing probation for an offender with no prior convictions and considering age and societal behavior.
The court can extend probation benefits to offenders above 21 years under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but granted probation, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for offenders above 21 years.
The court emphasized the necessity for trial courts to consider the application of probation laws for first-time offenders and the requirement to provide reasons for not applying such provisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering probation for first-time offenders and the requirement for special reasons when denying such benefits, particularly under the Probation of Offenders ....
Courts must consider probation for minor offences like voluntarily causing hurt, recording reasons if denied; appellate courts can grant benefit considering delay, offender character, reformatory aim....
Courts mandatorily consider probation for eligible offences under three years' imprisonment, recording reasons for denial; long pendency, no antecedents justify reformatory release over punishment.
(1) Benefit of probation – 1958 Act seeks to harmonize deterrence and reformation while empowering courts to release offenders after admonition or on probation of good conduct under supervision of Pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
