JUDGMENT :

K.R. Surana, J.

Heard Mr. A.T. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned CGC; Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the ECI; Mr. G. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the FT matters and NRC; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent.

2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the impugned opinion dated 08.03.20216, passed by the learned Member, Foreigner’s Tribunal, No.1, Goalpara in FT Case No.6449/G/2014, arising out of Reference No. 1365/98/D/GLP(B) and ERO Case No. 15-6/39, by which the petitioner was declared as an illegal migrant of post 25.03.1971 stream.

3. Assailing the opinion, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned Tribunal had failed to discuss the evidence of DW-2 and that none of the documents which were exhibited along with the evidence of the petitioner as DW-1 were not discussed. Moreover, it is submitted that, the written statement as well as the evidence submitted by the DW-1 and DW-2 lacked material particulars, the matter be