SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 982

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
C/5023374 Hav/Clerk L Tomba Singha And Ors. S/o Sanatomba Singha - Appellant
Vs.
The Union Of India & Ors. - Respondent 
WP(C) No. 3876 Of 2024
Decided On : 20-05-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR V KUMAR, MR. T NATH,MR B HAZARIKA,MS M TIWARI,MR B PATHAK
For the Respondent: DY.S.G.I., MR. S S ROY

Equity in pay structure mandates the implementation of rank parity for clerical positions in the Assam Rifles as previously adjudicated by higher courts.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Principles of Equality and Pay Structure - The court directed the respondent authorities to implement the 5th Pay Commission recommendations, merging certain ranks to bring parity with other Central Police Organizations from the date of enrollment as per previous rulings. (Paras 3, 4, 8, 14)

(B) Finality of Previous Orders - The court noted that the previous orders of the learned Single Judge and Supreme Court have attained finality and similar benefits should be extended to all similarly situated personnel. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, 422 Havildar/Clerks appointed in the Assam Rifles, sought the rank and pay scale equivalent to that of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Warrant Officer) as per earlier resolutions and judgments.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners are entitled to similar benefits as their counterparts in other proceedings due to the finality of established judgments.

Issues: The main issues included the applicability of previous decisions on rank and pay parity, and the procedural implementation of recommendations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the previously restored orders must be implemented for similar positions to ensure equality in pay and status within the cadre.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for compliance.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek rank structure benefits (Para 2 , 3)
2. contentions surrounding pay and rank parity (Para 4 , 8)
3. previous orders establish required pay adjustments (Para 5 , 6)
4. argument for extending prior benefits due to legal consistency. (Para 9)
5. finality of rank parity decision (Para 10 , 12)
6. court's reinforcement of the necessity to comply with earlier legal directives. (Para 11)
7. directives for granting benefits to petitioners (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
8. final directive to grant benefits and conclude the case. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. B. Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Roy, learned CGC appearing for all the respondents.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of rank structure, status and pay scale of Assistant Sub Inspector (Warrant Officer) in the pay scale of 1320-2014 (4000-6000) with effect from the date of enrollment in terms of the order dated 23.08.2012 passed in WP(C) No.(SH) 277 of 2010 and order dated 17.02.2023 passed in WP(C) 198/2019 as well as order dated 18.03.2025 passed in WA 12/2023 by the High Court of Meghalaya.

3. The petitioners, 422 in numbers, were initially appointed as Havildar/Clerk in the Assam Rifles, a cadre post in clerical grade, and are working in the same capacity at different units in the State of Assam under the Ministry of Home Affairs.

4. It is contended that the respondent authorities had failed to implement the 5th Pay Commission recommendation and at that point of time different serving personnel raised the issue that the post of Lance Naik and Naik of the clerical cadre of Assam Rifles were required to be merged with the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Warrant Officer) in order to bring parity in the rank structure and pay of clerical cadre with other Central Police Organizations. Some of the Havildar Clerks who were similarly situated to the present petitioners have approached before this Court by filing WP(C) 277 (SH)/2010 praying for parity in pay, rank and status at par with other Central Police Organizations by introducing the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Warrant Officer) at the entry grade w.e.f. 01.01.1986 in the scale of pay of Rs.1320-2040 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 with all consequential benefits in the light of the Government of India Memorandum dated 10.10.1997.

5. The writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 23.08.2012 with a direction to the respondent authorities to revise the rank and pay of the clerical cadre by introduction of the rank of warrant officer and to give effect to the benefits from 01.01.1986. The relevant paragraph is quoted herein below:-

“14. In the result, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2, the Director General of Assam Rifles to take up the matter again with the respondent No.1, i.e. the Secretary to the Govt. India, Ministry of Home Affairs to bring parity in respect of rank structure and pay of the Assam Rifles clerical cadre at par with other CPOs by introducing rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Warrant Officer) at the entry grade w.e.f. 1.1.1986 in the scale of pay of Rs1320-2040 (revised Rs.4000-6000) w.e.f. 1.1.1996 or any other date as the authority deem it fit and proper with all consequential service benefits in the light of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance resolution dated 20.9.1997 communicated through MH. letter bearing No.2701-02/1/97 PC Cell/Pef-1 dated 10.10.1997. The whole exercise would be completed within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judement and order”

6. The aforesaid order the Court was taken to an appeal by way of WA (SH) 40/2012 by the respondent authorities which was disposed of on 30.04.2013 by modifying the order of the learned Single Judge to the extent that the arrear financial benefits to be given to the petitioners in pursuance of the judgment and order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top