SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Namit Kumar, J.
Jatinder Pal Singh and others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents
CWP No. 16709, 17293, 18137, 14794, 16814 of 2017
Decided On : 06-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. T.P.S. Walia, AAG, Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, with Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sahil Bhadu, Advocate and Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for establishing parity in pay scales based on comparative job evaluation and equation of posts, and the burden of proof on the petitioners to establish such parity.

Headnote:

Anomaly in Pay-Scales - Punjab Mandi Board - 6th Pay Commission - 10300-34800+3800, 10300-34800+4400, 10300-34800+3200, 10300-34800+3600 - The court dismissed the petition seeking pay parity for the posts of Mandi Supervisors with Senior Assistants and Auction Recorders with Junior Assistants, citing lack of evidence and conscious decision of the government. The court emphasized the need for establishing parity in pay scales based on comparative job evaluation and equation of posts, and highlighted the burden of proof on the petitioners to establish such parity.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to take a final decision on a letter dated 04.02.2016, which sought approval for the removal of anomalies in the pay-scales of officers/officials of the Mandi Board. The petitioners claimed that prior to 01.12.2011, the pay-scales of Mandi Supervisors and Auction Recorders were at par with Senior Assistants and Junior Assistants, but after a revision of pay-scales, an anomaly was created.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the relief sought by the petitioners had already been granted, as a final decision had been taken by the government and the petitioners had been placed in the Grade Pay equivalent to the posts of Senior Assistants and Junior Assistants. The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the lack of evidence and conscious decision of the government to equate the posts.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to the same Grade Pay as Senior Assistants and Junior Assistants for the intervening period from 01.12.2011 to 31.12.2015, based on the principle of parity in pay scales.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the burden of proof in establishing parity in pay scales and nature of duties and responsibilities was on the petitioners, and emphasized the need for comparative job evaluation and equation of posts to establish such parity. The court highlighted the lack of evidence and conscious decision of the government to equate the posts, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, stating that the relief sought by the petitioners had already been granted, and emphasized the lack of evidence and conscious decision of the government to equate the posts, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

JUDGMENT :

NAMIT KUMAR J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of CWP Nos.16709, 17293, 18137, 14794 and 16814 of 2017, as common questions of law and fact are involved for adjudication. For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from CWP No.16709 of 2017.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner(s) invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.1 to 3 to take a final decision on letter dated 04.02.2016 (Annexure P-2), whereby the approval has been granted by the Board of Directors in the meeting held on 11.01.2016, whereby it was approved to send the case of pay-scale of officers/officials of different categories, for removal of anomalies in their pay-scales, as per the details given in agenda Item No.2 and it was requested that approval may be given to remove the anomalies in the pay-scales of officers/officials of the Mandi Board.

3. Brief facts, as have been pleaded by the petitioners in the present writ petition, are that the petitioners are employees of Punjab Mandi Board Market Committees and are working as Mandi Supervisors-cum-Fee Collectors and Auction Recorders. The case set up by the petitioners in the writ petition is that prior to 01.12.2011, the pay-scales of Mandi Supervisors were at par with Senior Assistants and similar was the position with regard to the post of Auction Recorders, whose pay-scale was also same as that of Junior Assistants and whereas w.e.f. 01.12.2011, after revision of pay-scales, anomaly has been created and the Senior Assistants have been placed in a higher Grade Pay of Rs.4400/- than that of Mandi Supervisors and similarly, Junior Assistants have been placed in a higher Grade Pay than that of Auction Recorders. The comparative chart with regard to above posts reproduced in the writ petition(s), showing their pay-scales and grade pay is reproduced, which reads as under:-

Name of posts

1986

1996

2006

From 1.12.2011

Mandi Supervisor-cum- Fee Collector

Rs.1800-3200

Rs.5800-9200

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3800

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3800

Senior Assistant

Rs.1800-3200

Rs.5800-9200

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3800

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.4400

 

Name of posts

1986

1996

2006

From 1.12.2011

Auction Recorder

Rs.1200-2100

Rs.5000-8100

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3200

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3200

Junior Assistant

Post was not in existence

Rs.4400-7000

Rs.5900-20200+Grade Pay Rs.2800

Rs.10300- 34800+Grade Pay Rs.3600

4. It has been further averred that the said anomaly has been crept in for the reason that since there is no post of Mandi Supervisor and Auction Recorder in the State of Punjab, therefore, the Notification dated 01.12.2011, is silent about these two posts and since there was an anomaly, therefore, the matter was taken up by the Punjab Mandi Board in the meeting of Board of Directors, held on 11.01.2016, whereby it was approved to send the case of pay-scales of officers/officials of different categories, for removal of anomalies in the pay-scales, as per the details given in agenda Item No.2 and it was requested that approval may be given to remove the anomaly in the pay-scales of officers/officials of the Mandi Board and since no action was taken by the respondent/State, therefore, the State President of Punjab Market Committee Employees Union sent a legal notice dated 11.05.2016, to the respondents for enhancing the Grade Pay of Mandi Supervisors and Auction Recorders. However, no action has been taken by the respondents, therefore, the instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners and a writ in the nature of mandamus, has been sought for directing the respondents to take a final decision on letter dated 04.02.2016 (Annexure P-2).

5. On issuance of notice of motion, separate replies have been filed by respondent No.1/State and respondent N

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top