HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, CJ., S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ.
Union of India & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
No.-m/371242l, Hav/dental Hygienist, Sri Jagroop Singh - Respondent
WA No. 21 of 2018
Decided On : 03-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment challenged based on rank entitlement (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. claim of parity in pay structure (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. previous high court ruling upheld (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. right to equal pay under article 14 (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. entitlement to benefits of warrant officer rank (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. court dismisses appeal, orders compliance (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This writ appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.592 of 2017.
2. The short question which requires our consideration in this writ appeal is whether the original writ petitioner [respondent herein] being a Havildar [Dental Hygienist] is entitled to the rank of Warrant Officer and pay and other service benefits as admissible to the rank of Warrant Officer with retrospective effect from 10.10.1997 along with consequential benefits at par with the Havildar [Radio Mechanic] in Assam Rifles and their counterparts in other Central Police Organizations.
3. Heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned CGC appearing for the appellants and Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior advocate appearing along with Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned advocate for Sri Jagroop Singh, original writ petitioner who is the respondent herein.
4. The factual context of the case is as under:
The original writ petitioner [respondent herein] was appointed as a Nursing Assistant in the Assam Rifles along with the private respondents [respondents No.5 to 18 in the writ petition]. After their induction in the post of Nursing Assistant on diverse dates, all of them were given basic nursing training called Nursing Assistant Basic [Class-IV] and thereafter they had undergone the up-gradation training [Class-III & Class-II] in nursing in various military hospitals. These facts are undisputed. The original writ petitioner and the private respondents also passed the Dental Hygienist Class-III [Diploma course] from the Command Military Hospital Centres situated at Lucknow, New Delhi, Pune and Kolkata etc. which are recognized institutes for imparting such training by the Dental Council of India. They had also undergone further training in nursing [Class-I] in various Command Military Hospital Centres and Armed Force Medical Colleges. The original writ petitioner, thus, acquired efficiency and skill in nursing by undergoing various training courses and obtaining qualifications from the institutions recognized by the Dental Council of India. Thereafter, the original writ petitioner and the private respondents were promoted to the post of Havildar [Dental Hygienist] on different dates in Assam Rifles.
5. It has been pleaded by the original writ petitioner that the post of Nursing Assistant, in which he had entered in the service in Assam Rifles is equivalent to the post of Rifleman [Operator Radio Line] which is the feeder post for promotion to Havildar [Radio Mechanic]. After undergoing nursing training in Class-IV, Class-III, Class-II and Class-I, the Nursing Assistants were promoted to the post of Havildar [Dental Hygienist] and the Rifleman [Operator Radio Line], after required training were promoted to the post of Havildar [Radio Mechanic].
6. It has been stated in the writ petition that one Radio Mechanic namely, Dineshan K.K. of Assam Rifles filed WP(C) No.497 of 2001 in the Gauhati High Court seeking a direction to the respondents to bring about a parity in the pay scales of Havildar [Radio Mechanic] of Assam Rifles qua the Radio Mechanics of other Central Police Organizations namely, Delhi Police and Border Security Force [BSF]. While articulating his grievance in the said writ petition, said writ petitioner Dineshan K.K. pleaded that though the Union of India and Director General of Assam Rifles accepted that the members of Assam Rifles should be given same rank and pay structure at par with their counterparts in other Central Police Organizations by an order dated 10.10.1997, the Havildar [Radio Mechanics] of Assam Rifles were d
Purshottam Lal and Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr. (1973) 1 SCC 651
State of Haryana & Anr. vs. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Association : (2002) 6 SCC 72
The denial of equal pay and benefits to similarly situated personnel violates constitutional principles of equality, reaffirming the established parity in ranks between different roles in similar pos....
Equity in pay structure mandates the implementation of rank parity for clerical positions in the Assam Rifles as previously adjudicated by higher courts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a petitioner, after being re-mustered from a clerical position to a general cadre, is not entitled to the benefits granted to clerical staff i....
Determination of pay scale and equivalence is a primary function of the executives and expert bodies like Pay Commission and is not a function of writ court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Arti....
Officiating in a higher post does not grant entitlement to associated benefits unless the individual meets the promotion criteria.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the equivalence of two posts for the purpose of seniority should be determined based on various factors, including the nature of duties, respo....
The Tribunal must exercise judicial restraint in administrative pay parity disputes, focusing instead on the differentiation rationale provided by authorities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.