Back
INDRAJIT MAHANTY, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
No. -M/371242l, Hav/dental Hygienist, Sri Jagroop Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment challenged based on rank entitlement (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. claim of parity in pay structure (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. previous high court ruling upheld (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. right to equal pay under article 14 (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. entitlement to benefits of warrant officer rank (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. court dismisses appeal, orders compliance (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This writ appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.592 of 2017.
2. The short question which requires our consideration in this writ appeal is whether the original writ petitioner [respondent herein] being a Havildar [Dental Hygienist] is entitled to the rank of Warrant Officer and pay and other service benefits as admissible to the rank of Warrant Officer with retrospective effect from 10.10.1997 along with consequential benefits at par with the Havildar [Radio Mechanic] in Assam Rifles and their counterparts in other Central Police Organizations.
3. Heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned CGC appearing for the appellants and Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior advocate appearing along with Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned advocate for Sri
The denial of equal pay and benefits to similarly situated personnel violates constitutional principles of equality, reaffirming the established parity in ranks between different roles in similar pos....
Equity in pay structure mandates the implementation of rank parity for clerical positions in the Assam Rifles as previously adjudicated by higher courts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a petitioner, after being re-mustered from a clerical position to a general cadre, is not entitled to the benefits granted to clerical staff i....
Determination of pay scale and equivalence is a primary function of the executives and expert bodies like Pay Commission and is not a function of writ court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Arti....
Officiating in a higher post does not grant entitlement to associated benefits unless the individual meets the promotion criteria.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the equivalence of two posts for the purpose of seniority should be determined based on various factors, including the nature of duties, respo....
The Tribunal must exercise judicial restraint in administrative pay parity disputes, focusing instead on the differentiation rationale provided by authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
