SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 212

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, CJ., S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ.
Union of India & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
No.-m/371242l, Hav/dental Hygienist, Sri Jagroop Singh - Respondent
WA No. 21 of 2018
Decided On : 03-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. B. Majumder, CGC., for the Appellant(s); Mr. Somik Deb, Sr. Adv., Ms. R. Chakraborty, Advocate., for the Respondent(s)

The denial of equal pay and benefits to similarly situated personnel violates constitutional principles of equality, reaffirming the established parity in ranks between different roles in similar positions.

Headnote:(A) Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India - Writ Appeal challenging denial of benefits including the rank of Warrant Officer to a Havildar [Dental Hygienist] - Relevant communication dated 28.07.1998 acknowledged equivalence in rank and pay with Havildar [Radio Mechanic] but denied by respondents as inequitable - Court reasserted existence of parity and ruled that denial was arbitrary and irrational. (Paras 1-3, 5, 22, 23)

(B) Equal pay for equal work - Denial of benefits to similarly situated employees is violative of constitutional guarantees - Administrative discretion should not disrupt historical pay parity established amongst paramilitary personnel. (Paras 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The original writ petitioner was a Havildar [Dental Hygienist] in Assam Rifles, who claimed equivalence in rank and pay with the Havildar [Radio Mechanic], granted Warrant Officer status. The petitioner relied on historical context and communication from authorities.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge directed that benefits of Warrant Officer rank, pay, and allowances be extended to the petitioner in line with the granted benefits to Havildars [Radio Mechanic], to be implemented within three months.

Issues: Whether the Havildar [Dental Hygienist] is entitled to Warrant Officer benefits comparably to Havildar [Radio Mechanic] and if so, based on the communication dated 28.07.1998.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed no substantive basis for denying parity between comparable ranks; historical context and official communications supported the petitioner's claim for equal treatment under Article 14.

Result: Appeal dismissed; benefits ordered to be extended.

Table of Content
1. judgment challenged based on rank entitlement (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. claim of parity in pay structure (Para 5 , 6 , 11)
3. previous high court ruling upheld (Para 7 , 8)
4. right to equal pay under article 14 (Para 13 , 15)
5. entitlement to benefits of warrant officer rank (Para 20 , 21)
6. court dismisses appeal, orders compliance (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This writ appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.592 of 2017.

2. The short question which requires our consideration in this writ appeal is whether the original writ petitioner [respondent herein] being a Havildar [Dental Hygienist] is entitled to the rank of Warrant Officer and pay and other service benefits as admissible to the rank of Warrant Officer with retrospective effect from 10.10.1997 along with consequential benefits at par with the Havildar [Radio Mechanic] in Assam Rifles and their counterparts in other Central Police Organizations.

3. Heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned CGC appearing for the appellants and Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior advocate appearing along with Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned advocate for Sri Jagroop Singh, original writ petitioner who is the respondent herein.

4. The factual context of the case is as under:

The original writ petitioner [respondent herein] was appointed as a Nursing Assistant in the Assam Rifles along with the private respondents [respondents No.5 to 18 in the writ petition]. After their induction in the post of Nursing Assistant on diverse dates, all of them were given basic nursing training called Nursing Assistant Basic [Class-IV] and thereafter they had undergone the up-gradation training [Class-III & Class-II] in nursing in various military hospitals. These facts are undisputed. The original writ petitioner and the private respondents also passed the Dental Hygienist Class-III [Diploma course] from the Command Military Hospital Centres situated at Lucknow, New Delhi, Pune and Kolkata etc. which are recognized institutes for imparting such training by the Dental Council of India. They had also undergone further training in nursing [Class-I] in various Command Military Hospital Centres and Armed Force Medical Colleges. The original writ petitioner, thus, acquired efficiency and skill in nursing by undergoing various training courses and obtaining qualifications from the institutions recognized by the Dental Council of India. Thereafter, the original writ petitioner and the private respondents were promoted to the post of Havildar [Dental Hygienist] on different dates in Assam Rifles.

5. It has been pleaded by the original writ petitioner that the post of Nursing Assistant, in which he had entered in the service in Assam Rifles is equivalent to the post of Rifleman [Operator Radio Line] which is the feeder post for promotion to Havildar [Radio Mechanic]. After undergoing nursing training in Class-IV, Class-III, Class-II and Class-I, the Nursing Assistants were promoted to the post of Havildar [Dental Hygienist] and the Rifleman [Operator Radio Line], after required training were promoted to the post of Havildar [Radio Mechanic].

6. It has been stated in the writ petition that one Radio Mechanic namely, Dineshan K.K. of Assam Rifles filed WP(C) No.497 of 2001 in the Gauhati High Court seeking a direction to the respondents to bring about a parity in the pay scales of Havildar [Radio Mechanic] of Assam Rifles qua the Radio Mechanics of other Central Police Organizations namely, Delhi Police and Border Security Force [BSF]. While articulating his grievance in the said writ petition, said writ petitioner Dineshan K.K. pleaded that though the Union of India and Director General of Assam Rifles accepted that the members of Assam Rifles should be given same rank and pay structure at par with their counterparts in other Central Police Organizations by an order dated 10.10.1997, the Havildar [Radio Mechanics] of Assam Rifles were d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top