Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manish Choudhury, Yarenjungla longkumer
Santok Hans, Tinsukia, Assam – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, represented by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of charges and trial outcomes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the fir and investigation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding witness testimonies and credibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 36) |
| 5. significant reliance on testimonies of injured witnesses for establishing guilt. (Para 29) |
| 6. evidential weight of injured witnesses. (Para 30 , 32) |
| 7. recognition of the legal implications of admissions made during section 313 examination. (Para 42) |
| 8. establishing appellant's culpability based on evidence. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 9. legal definitions concerning grievous hurt and attempt to murder. (Para 47 , 49) |
| 10. final judgments on conviction and sentence. (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 11. modification of sentences while upholding convictions based on the evidence presented. (Para 54) |
JUDGMENT :
Manish Choudhury, J.
This criminal appeal from Jail under Section 383 , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [‘CrPC’ or ‘the Code’, for short] is directed against a Judgment and Order dated 25.11.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge [FTC-1], Margherita, Tinsukia in Sessions Case no. 10[M] of 2016, which arose out of G.R. Case
The admission of guilt by the accused, combined with corroborating testimonies from injured witnesses, sustains the conviction under relevant IPC sections despite the absence of one material witness.
The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value, and their accounts should not be dismissed without compelling reasons, especially when corroborated by medical evidence.
The evidence of an injured witness is accorded special status in law, and their testimony is generally reliable unless substantial contradictions are present. The court emphasized the importance of e....
The intent to commit murder must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and in this case, it was established that the act fell under grievous hurt.
The testimony of a sole eyewitness can sustain a murder conviction if credible, consistent with medical evidence, and unshaken by cross-examination.
The court affirmed the conviction for murder, emphasizing the consistency of eyewitness accounts as reliable evidence supporting the charges under Sections 302 and 9(b) of the Indian Penal Code.
(1) Murder and wrongful confinement – In every criminal trial, minor variations in detail are bound to occur – Discrepancies which do not go to root of prosecution case cannot obliterate otherwise tr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of consistent witness statements and the requirement for the prosecution to explain injuries sustained by the accused.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
