Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY
Pabitra Das S/o Late Dhaneswar Das – Appellant
Versus
General Manager Indian Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and overview of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's claims and circumstances of default. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. bank's response and adherence to procedures. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's analysis of agreement and petitioner's request. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. legal context of one-time settlement and its implications. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. proper procedures for vehicle repossession. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. conclusion and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Parashar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Indian Bank for the respondent nos. 1 & 2.
2. The projections made in the writ petition can be narrated, at first, in brief. The petitioner has stated that in the year 2022, he purchased a vehicle bearing Registration no. AS-01-FG/9546 [Aura 1.2 MT Kappa S (Hyundai)] [‘the subject-vehicle’, for short] after obtaining financial facility from the respondent Bank on 21.10.2022. As per the terms and conditions of an Agreement executed with the respondent Bank, the petitioner was required to pay eighty-four nos. of Equated Monthly Installments [EMIs] @ Rs. 10,557/- per month in
None identified. Based on the provided text, none of the listed cases contain explicit language indicating they have been overruled, reversed, abrogated, or otherwise explicitly invalidated by a higher court.
None. The provided descriptions are summaries of the holdings/directives within the cases rather than citational updates, which makes the judicial treatment patterns within the list internally consistent and clearly focused on the application of the law.
Financial institutions must adhere to due process in vehicle repossession, and courts cannot alter agreed contractual terms under writ jurisdiction.
The plaintiff's default in loan repayment and the classification of the loan account as NPA disentitled her from obtaining an interim injunction.
The borrower's right of redemption is extinguished upon the publication of the auction notice, allowing the auction purchaser to claim possession.
The duty of a litigant to disclose all material facts and the bank's right to protect its recovery were the central legal points established in the judgment.
The court affirmed that once vehicle repossession occurs under SARFAESI, the aggrieved party must challenge such repossession through the appropriate statutory tribunal rather than via subsequent wri....
A writ petition is maintainable against a scheduled bank under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the bank is performing public functions and is governed by the provisions of the Banking Re....
The court emphasizes the necessity for the bank to consider the debtor's One Time Settlement request without further delay, safeguarding the debtor's interests during proceedings under the SARFAESI A....
The court established that the right of redemption under the SARFAESI Act is extinguished upon the issuance of a sale certificate, and timely challenge to bank actions is essential.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
