Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ., ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Albeen Josebh Ahmed, Son of Jahur Uddin Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Badal Khan, Son of Samad Khan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. selection process governed by prior office memorandum (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. changes in selection criteria must not alter rules post-advertisement (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. precedent establishes criteria alteration prohibited post-recruitment commencement (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. eligibility criteria should remain unchanged during recruitment (Para 26) |
| 5. defense of modifying marking pattern analyzed (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. final ruling affirms prior decision, directing adherence to original terms (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh Kumar, CJ.
We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. R. Ali, learned Advocate for the appellant; Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. M. Alam Geer, learned Advocate for the respondent No.1 and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education (Higher) Department for the respondent Nos.2 & 4.
2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 05.05.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.5757/2024, whereby the respondents therein have been directed to proceed with the selection process for the post of Assist
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
