Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ROBIN PHUKAN
Gunajit Nath, S/o. Late Jogendra Nath – Appellant
Versus
Hitesh Das, S/o Late Harmohan Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the appellant in MAC Appeal No.285/2020 and Mr. M.H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1- 4 and Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6. None appears for the respondent No.5.
2. Also heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant in MAC Appeal No.332/2021, Mr. M.H. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1- 4 and Mr. S. Islam for the respondent No. 5. None appears for the respondent No. 6.
3. In these appeals, being MAC Appeal No.285/2020, and MAC Appeal No.332/2021, the judgment and award, dated 23.09.2019, passed in MAC Case No.46/2019, by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Barpeta, is being challenged.
4. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and award dated 23.09.2019, passed in MAC Case No.46/2019, the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Barpeta (Tribunal hereinafter) had allowed the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, 1988 by one Hitesh Das and three others, and directed the O.P. No.3- HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay an amount of Rs. 26,80,667/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakhs Eighty Thous
The court affirmed that compensation for a non-earning spouse must be calculated as a third of the earning spouse’s income, despite the absence of a vehicle permit not exempting insurance liabilities....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory requirements in motor vehicle insurance and the correct calculation of compensation for dependents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of permit conditions under the Motor Vehicle Act and the liability of the insurance company in a motor accident case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in motor accident claims, considering factors such as negligence, income of the deceased, number of dependents, a....
The court recalculated compensation for deceased victims based on proper income assessment and future prospects, while affirming the award for the injured party, emphasizing the need for valid drivin....
The court ruled that compensation for motor vehicle accidents must reflect just compensation, emphasizing the burden of proof on the insurer regarding the driver's licence validity.
Point of Law : Power vested under Article 142 of the Constitution is an extra ordinary jurisdiction which is not exercisable by this Court or the MACT and therefore, it can be said that exercise made....
The court affirmed that contributory negligence must be supported by substantive evidence, and modified compensation reflects adherence to established legal principles.
Compensation under Section 163A of the M.V. Act does not require proof of negligence, and structured compensation formulas must be applied to ensure fair awards to claimants.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
