IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.
Sudha Devi - Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction No. 7401 of 2020
Decided On : 26-02-2021
Service Law – Petitioners seeking setting aside of illegal list of candidates, shortlisted for documents verification with regard to appointment on the post of ANM (NHUM) in pursuance of advertisement No.12 of 2019, issued by the Bihar Health Society – in the advertisement No. 12/2019, there is no stipulation regarding publication of any merit list, solely on the basis of the computer based test and the only procedure prescribed is that a merit list would be prepared on the basis of the marks obtained by the respective candidates in the computer based test totaled up with the marks obtained against the academic qualification, meaning thereby that the merit list has to be prepared on the basis of marks obtained by the respective candidates out of a total of 100 marks and finally a list of the successful candidates has to be prepared on the basis of the said merit list upon verification of documents and applying the reservation roster – the selection procedure as well as the guidelines as prescribed in the advertisement has duly been followed – no infirmity in the selection process and the writ petition is bereft of any merit – that apart, successful candidates having already joined their post, have not been impleaded nor the final select list of the successful candidates has been challenged – petitioners cannot be granted any relief – writ petition dismissed. (Paras 8, 9, & 11)
(2010)12 SCC 204, (2014)16 SCC 187—Referred.
JUDGMENT
Mohit Kumar Shah, J. - The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the illegal list of candidates, shortlisted for documents verification with regard to appointment on the post of ANM (NUHM), in pursuance to the advertisement No. 12 of 2019, issued by the respondent no. 2. The petitioners have further prayed for directing the respondent-authorities to follow the guidelines issued by the State Health Society of Bihar (herein after referred to as the "Health Society"), with regard to publication of result of the petitioners and others as well as to take fair and impartial steps with regard to publication of the result of the computer based test appertaining to the said Advertisement No. 12 of 2019, as far as the post of ANM (NUHM) is concerned and then prepare the merit list for the purposes of appointment on the post of ANM (NUHM).
2. The brief facts of the case are that an advertisement bearing Advertisement No. 12 of 2019 dated 27.12.2019 was issued by the Health Society, Patna for the purposes of making appointment on the post of Lab Technician (NUHM) and ANM (NUHM). As far as the Lab Technician (NUHM) is concerned, total number of posts advertised were 100 and as far as ANM (NUHM) is concerned, the total number of posts advertised were 500. Clause-12 of the aforesaid Advertisement No. 12 of 2019 prescribes the basis for selection. Under the said clause-12, it has been stipulated that the merit list shall be prepared on the basis of the marks obtained in the computer based test (CBT), which would be of 50 marks as well as on the basis of academic qualification, which would also be of 50 marks. The petitioners are stated to have filled application forms Online and as far as the petitioners no. 1 and 2 are concerned, they belong to the Most Backward Class (female) category and as far as the petitioner no.3 is concerned, she also belongs to the female, Economically weaker section category. The Admit cards were then issued to the eligible candidates including the petitioners herein and they had sat for the computer examination on 14.03.2020, however, it is the grievance of the petitioners that the computer based result has not been published till date.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the scheme of selection prescribed in the aforesaid Advertisement No. 12 of 2019, it is imperative to first publish the computer based test results and then publish the merit list, taking into account the marks pertaining to the academic qualifications and only then the appointment can be made, however, the said procedure has not been adopted by the respondent Health Society, hence, the entire selection process has been rendered illegal and void. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further referred to the guidelines issued by the Health Society, which is at Annexure-5 series to the writ petition and it has been submitted that after conduct of the computer based online test, a merit list was required to be prepared and only then shortlisted candidates were required to be called for document verification/ counseling in the ratio of 1:1.5, however, the said process has not been followed by the respondents.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the Health Society has submitted by referring to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents no. 2 and 3, that the petitioners had submitted application against the Advertisement no. 12 of 2019 for their appointment on the post of ANM (NUHM) along with the requisite documents and fees and had also appeared in the computer based test held on 14.03.2020. It is also submitted that Clause-12 of the said Advertisement No. 12 of 2019 prescribes the mode of selection process as well as the criteria for selection and both computer based test and academic qualifications carry 50 marks each. It is further submitted that after holding the computer based test, the respondent- Health Society had prepared as list of qualified candidates whereupon th
Tridip Kumar Dingal vs. State of W.B. Tridip Kumar Dingal vs. State of W.B.
Babubhai Muljibhai Patel vs. Nandlal Khodidas Barot
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh vs. State of Gujarat
Indu Shekhar Singh vs. State of U.P.
Prabodh Verma vs. State of U.P.
Public Service Commission vs. Mamta Bisht
Ranjan Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Sarguja Transport Service vs. STAT Sarguja Transport Service vs. STAT
The court affirmed that petitioners, having previously accepted the selection process, were barred from later contesting the methodology due to principles of waiver and acquiescence, despite alleging....
The court established that merit lists for public appointments must strictly adhere to the prescribed guidelines, and any deviation that introduces favoritism or lacks transparency is subject to judi....
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
The recruitment process must adhere strictly to stipulations in the advertisement, and a candidate cannot contest procedures post-participation without valid grievances if unsuccessful.
Selection processes must be fair and transparent, with candidates having no vested rights if they participated without protest, respecting merit-based adjustments among categories.
Candidate participating in selection process estopped from challenging it post non-selection on merits.
The court ruled that the selection process for Junior Assistant posts did not violate constitutional rights, emphasizing the need for accuracy in recruitment advertisements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.