SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2250

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Dr Sangeeta Dutta W/o Dr. Walliul Islam - Appellant 
Versus
The State Of Assam And Anr. Rep. By The Special PP, Assam - Respondent  Bail Appln. No. 2805 of 2025
Decided On : 18-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. W R Medhi, Mr. N J Dutta,S Rahman,Mr A Basumatary,S I Ahmed,Mr P Talukdar,Mr A V Singh
For the Respondent: PP, Assam, Mr A.K. Hajong (For Victim),Mr. S. K. Chakma(For Victim),Ms. D Ghosh(For Victim),Mr P Bhardwaj(R-2),Mr. D J Kapil

Violation of arrest procedures under the Criminal Procedure Code and prolonged pre-trial detention infringe on the fundamental rights of the accused, warranting the grant of bail.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 50, 50A, 41B(b), 46(4), 60A - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Sections 75/80 - POCSO Act, 2012 - Application for bail - The applicant held in custody for over 2.5 years, alleging violations during arrest including failure to provide grounds of arrest, and lack of notice to relatives as required by law - Court highlights the significant delays in trial and the applicant's lengthy incarceration as critical issues. (Paras 3, 4, 9, 12, 22, 35)

(B) Fundamental Rights - Right to Life and Personal Liberty - Prolonged detention without trial violates Articles 21 and 22(1) of the Constitution - Failure to comply with procedural safeguards in arrest contributes to the illegality of the arrest, warranting bail. (Paras 21, 27, 28)

(C) Bail Application - The court emphasizes the necessity of prompt legal procedures and outlines conditions for bail, ensuring the trial's integrity is maintained. (Paras 36)

Facts of the case:
The bail application arises from allegations of severe abuse of a minor, leading to numerous charges against the applicant and co-accused. The applicant has been imprisoned since May 7, 2023, without significant progress in the trial, which has faced considerable delays.

Findings of Court:
Violations of statutory and constitutional rights necessitate bail, emphasizing the importance of complying with procedural safeguards during arrest.

Issues: The primary questions tackled include the legality of the arrest based on alleged procedural violations, the lengthy duration of pretrial incarceration, and the grounds for granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserts that fundamental rights supersede statutory delays and procedural missteps, allowing for the applicant’s release on bail, noting similar treatment for co-accused.

Result: Bail granted.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments for bail based on trial progress and similar cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguing illegal arrest due to procedural violations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. highlighting long incarceration and implications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. counterarguments from the prosecution. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. court's observations on trial speed and incarceration. (Para 21 , 22)
7. legal reasoning regarding violations of rights. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. conclusions on illegal arrest and its implications. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
9. decision on bail based on established arguments. (Para 35)
10. final order and directions regarding bail (Para 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.

Heard Mr. N J Dutta, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. P S Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State as well as Mr. D J Kapil, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. Also heard Mr. S K Chakma, learned counsel for the victim.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS , 2023, praying for grant of regular bail to the accused applicant, namely, Dr. Sangeeta Dutta, in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 193/2023 dated 05.05.2023 registered under Sections 307 /325/341/34 IPC with added Sections 366 (A)/367/368/376 of read with Sections 75 /80 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (in short JJ Act, 2015) further read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, currently pending trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati being Sessions (Special) Case No. 112/2023.

3. The facts as can be seen from the instant application are summarized herein below –

(i) An FIR was lodged against the accused applicant and two other co-accused persons before the Paltan Bazar Police Station on 05.05.2023 by one Akash Mandal, alleging that a girl child aged about three years was badly tortured by her foster parents without mercy. It was alleged that the aforesaid foster parents used to tie her under the direct sunlight on the 5 floor of the th building (terrace) in summer days like an animal without water and food with the intension to kill her. It was alleged that the minor girl was left without any water and food for the whole day under the direct sunlight which could have caused heat-stroke at any point of time resulting in her death. It was further alleged that as per the information of the neighbors, the aforesaid torture on the minor girl was going on for the last fifteen days and she got grievously hurt from the knots of the rope around her hands.

(ii) On receipt of the FIR, police registered a case under Sections 307 /325/34/341 of IPC read with Section 75 of the J J Act, 2015.

(iii) Another FIR was lodged on 08.05.2023 against four persons including the accused applicant by the Investigating Officer which was registered and numbered as Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 201/2023 under Sections 307 /341/325/366A/361/368/341 IPC read with Sections 6 /17/21 of the POCSO Act further read with Sections 75 /80 of JJ Act, 2015.

(iv) After investigation, police submitted a Charge-Sheet on 03.07.2023 being Charge-Sheet No. 140/2023 in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 193/2023 against the accused applicant and four other persons under the various provisions of law.

(v) The accused applicant was charge-sheeted under Sections 307 /325/326/341/370(5)/506/465/466/468/471 IPC read with Sections 75 /80/81 of the JJ Act, 2015 read with Section 6 /17 of the POCSO Act, 2012, wherein she was arrayed as the accused No. 2.

(vi) After further investigation, the police filed another Charge-Sheet on 06.07.2023 being Charge-Sheet No. 151/2023 in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 201/2023 against the accused applicant and four other persons under Sections 307 /341/325/366(A)/361/367/368/341 IPC read with Sections 6 /1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top