THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Dr Sangeeta Dutta W/o Dr. Walliul Islam - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And Anr. Rep. By The Special PP, Assam - Respondent Bail Appln. No. 2805 of 2025
Decided On : 18-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for bail based on trial progress and similar cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguing illegal arrest due to procedural violations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. highlighting long incarceration and implications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. counterarguments from the prosecution. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court's observations on trial speed and incarceration. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. legal reasoning regarding violations of rights. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. conclusions on illegal arrest and its implications. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. decision on bail based on established arguments. (Para 35) |
| 10. final order and directions regarding bail (Para 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Heard Mr. N J Dutta, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. P S Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State as well as Mr. D J Kapil, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. Also heard Mr. S K Chakma, learned counsel for the victim.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS , 2023, praying for grant of regular bail to the accused applicant, namely, Dr. Sangeeta Dutta, in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 193/2023 dated 05.05.2023 registered under Sections 307 /325/341/34 IPC with added Sections 366 (A)/367/368/376 of read with Sections 75 /80 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (in short JJ Act, 2015) further read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, currently pending trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati being Sessions (Special) Case No. 112/2023.
3. The facts as can be seen from the instant application are summarized herein below –
(i) An FIR was lodged against the accused applicant and two other co-accused persons before the Paltan Bazar Police Station on 05.05.2023 by one Akash Mandal, alleging that a girl child aged about three years was badly tortured by her foster parents without mercy. It was alleged that the aforesaid foster parents used to tie her under the direct sunlight on the 5 floor of the th building (terrace) in summer days like an animal without water and food with the intension to kill her. It was alleged that the minor girl was left without any water and food for the whole day under the direct sunlight which could have caused heat-stroke at any point of time resulting in her death. It was further alleged that as per the information of the neighbors, the aforesaid torture on the minor girl was going on for the last fifteen days and she got grievously hurt from the knots of the rope around her hands.
(ii) On receipt of the FIR, police registered a case under Sections 307 /325/34/341 of IPC read with Section 75 of the J J Act, 2015.
(iii) Another FIR was lodged on 08.05.2023 against four persons including the accused applicant by the Investigating Officer which was registered and numbered as Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 201/2023 under Sections 307 /341/325/366A/361/368/341 IPC read with Sections 6 /17/21 of the POCSO Act further read with Sections 75 /80 of JJ Act, 2015.
(iv) After investigation, police submitted a Charge-Sheet on 03.07.2023 being Charge-Sheet No. 140/2023 in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 193/2023 against the accused applicant and four other persons under the various provisions of law.
(v) The accused applicant was charge-sheeted under Sections 307 /325/326/341/370(5)/506/465/466/468/471 IPC read with Sections 75 /80/81 of the JJ Act, 2015 read with Section 6 /17 of the POCSO Act, 2012, wherein she was arrayed as the accused No. 2.
(vi) After further investigation, the police filed another Charge-Sheet on 06.07.2023 being Charge-Sheet No. 151/2023 in connection with Paltan Bazar Police Station Case No. 201/2023 against the accused applicant and four other persons under Sections 307 /341/325/366(A)/361/367/368/341 IPC read with Sections 6 /1
Prabir Purkayastha -Vs- State (NCT of Delhi)
Pankaj Bansal -Vs- Union of India and Ors.
Violation of arrest procedures under the Criminal Procedure Code and prolonged pre-trial detention infringe on the fundamental rights of the accused, warranting the grant of bail.
Compliance with Section 50 of the Cr.P.C. and the seriousness of charges under the NDPS Act negate the automatic entitlement to bail, despite prolonged incarceration.
Failure to communicate arrest grounds does not automatically entitle a petitioner to bail involving serious narcotics charges under the NDPS Act.
The arrest of an individual must comply with constitutional and statutory requirements, including providing specific grounds for arrest, which must be communicated in writing to ensure the accused's ....
Detention from the time of the raid constituted a violation of the Applicant's rights under Articles 21 and 22(2) of the Constitution, leading to the grant of bail with stringent conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.