SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 76

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Mithu Nath, S/o. Atindra Kr. Nath And Ors. – Petitioners 
Versus
The State of Assam, Rep. By The Comm. And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Home And Political Deptt. and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.470 of 2020, WP(C) No.3148 of 2023, WP(C) No.6140 of 2021, WP(C) No.2831 of 2021, WP(C) No.577 of 2020, 
Decided On : 22-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.J. Quadir, Mr. K. Mira, Mr S.S. Islam, Adv.
For the Respondent: GA, Assam, Ms G. Hazarika, SC, NRC.

Contractual employees have no vested rights to employment continuity when the associated project is concluded, and termination is lawful if conducted per the contract terms.

Headnote:(A) Citizenship Act, 1955 - Section 18 - Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 - Rules 4A and 11 - Discontinuation of service of contractual employees under NRC Updation Project - Petitioners claimed regularization and continuation of service alleging arbitrary dismissal; however, the court found their terminations lawful adhering to the contract terms as the NRC updation process was advised by the Central Government to be essentially completed. The court emphasized that contractual hires do not have a vested right to employment continuation when the project is concluded. (Paras 1 to 51)

(B) Contractual Employment - Right to Continue - Engaged purely on contract, employees cannot assert rights beyond the contract period. Terminations were in accordance with regulatory provisions and contractual agreements; sufficient notice was provided. (Paras 20, 39, 50)

(C) Principles of Equality and Fairness - Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution were discussed, emphasizing that even senior contractual employees must not be subjected to arbitrary treatment. (Paras 16, 45)

Table of Content
1. overview of the factual background regarding nrc contractual engagements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioners argued against termination citing statutory rights. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 14)
3. petitioners emphasized their consistent performance evaluations. (Para 8 , 11 , 13 , 15 , 16)
4. counsel provided statutory defenses for the petitioners' sustained engagement. (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 24)
5. responses highlighted contractual provisions allowing termination. (Para 20 , 22 , 23)
6. observations on discontinuation of the nrc project and its implications. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 36)
7. legal framework guiding nrc updation regulations. (Para 34 , 35 , 37)
8. clarification on contractual obligations and termination rights. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
9. judicial principles governing temporary employees and state obligations. (Para 42 , 43 , 46 , 47)
10. final conclusions and dismissal of petitions based on lack of merit. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. P. K. Goswami, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. B. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 3148/2023 and WP(C) No. 6140/2021; Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 2831/2021; and Mr. M. J. Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 470/2020 and WP(C) No. 577/2020. Also heard Mr. J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel for the NRC and Mr. A. K. Dutta, learned CGC for the Union of India.

2. By filing these writ petitions, the petitioners, who were appointed as Circle Project Supervisors, Junior Assistants and Helpers on contractual basis under the National Register of Citizens (NRC) Updation Project in the State of Assam, have assailed the notices/orders of discontinuation from services by the respondent authorities. The petitioners have also prayed for regularization/ absorption in the sanction posts of their respective grades as the NRC updation process is a continuous process as per Rule 11 of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003.

3. Having considered that the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar on facts and law, same were taken up analogously and disposed of by this common judgment and order.

4. In WP(C) No. 3148/2023, the petitioners were engaged as Circle Project Supervisors on contractual basis after due selection in terms of Rule 5.4 of the National Register of Citizens Updation Project (NRCP) Service Regulations, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “NRCP Service Regulations, 2014”, in short). In WP(C) No. 6140/2021 & WP(C) No. 577/2020, the petitioners were appointed as Helpers which constitute the Grade-IV cadre of the NRC updation process, in terms of the said NRCP Service Regulations, 2014. In WP(C) No. 470/2020 & WP(C) No. 2831/2021, the petitioners were appointed as Junior Assistants, in terms of the said NRCP Service Regulations, 2014.

5. Briefly put, the case of the petitioners is that pursuant to advertisements issued in the year 2014 for engagement of various categories of contractual posts under the NRC Updation Project in the State of Assam, the petitioners had participated in the selection process and were engaged as Circle Project Supervisors, Junior Assistants and Helpers on contractual basis in different districts and circles of the State. Their engagements were governed by the NRCP Service Regulations, 2014, framed by the Government of Assam, which prescribe the method of selection, continuance and disengagement of contractual employees.

6. The engagements of the petitioners were pursuant to the notification dated 05.12.2013, issued by the Registrar General of India under Section 18 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, notifying the decision of the Central Government to update the NRC, 1951 in the State of Assam in accordance with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “Ci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top