THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Mithu Nath, S/o. Atindra Kr. Nath And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Assam, Rep. By The Comm. And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Home And Political Deptt. and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.470 of 2020, WP(C) No.3148 of 2023, WP(C) No.6140 of 2021, WP(C) No.2831 of 2021, WP(C) No.577 of 2020,
Decided On : 22-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the factual background regarding nrc contractual engagements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioners argued against termination citing statutory rights. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. petitioners emphasized their consistent performance evaluations. (Para 8 , 11 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. counsel provided statutory defenses for the petitioners' sustained engagement. (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 24) |
| 5. responses highlighted contractual provisions allowing termination. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. observations on discontinuation of the nrc project and its implications. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 36) |
| 7. legal framework guiding nrc updation regulations. (Para 34 , 35 , 37) |
| 8. clarification on contractual obligations and termination rights. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. judicial principles governing temporary employees and state obligations. (Para 42 , 43 , 46 , 47) |
| 10. final conclusions and dismissal of petitions based on lack of merit. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
Heard Mr. P. K. Goswami, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. B. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 3148/2023 and WP(C) No. 6140/2021; Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 2831/2021; and Mr. M. J. Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 470/2020 and WP(C) No. 577/2020. Also heard Mr. J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel for the NRC and Mr. A. K. Dutta, learned CGC for the Union of India.
2. By filing these writ petitions, the petitioners, who were appointed as Circle Project Supervisors, Junior Assistants and Helpers on contractual basis under the National Register of Citizens (NRC) Updation Project in the State of Assam, have assailed the notices/orders of discontinuation from services by the respondent authorities. The petitioners have also prayed for regularization/ absorption in the sanction posts of their respective grades as the NRC updation process is a continuous process as per Rule 11 of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003.
3. Having considered that the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar on facts and law, same were taken up analogously and disposed of by this common judgment and order.
4. In WP(C) No. 3148/2023, the petitioners were engaged as Circle Project Supervisors on contractual basis after due selection in terms of Rule 5.4 of the National Register of Citizens Updation Project (NRCP) Service Regulations, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “NRCP Service Regulations, 2014”, in short). In WP(C) No. 6140/2021 & WP(C) No. 577/2020, the petitioners were appointed as Helpers which constitute the Grade-IV cadre of the NRC updation process, in terms of the said NRCP Service Regulations, 2014. In WP(C) No. 470/2020 & WP(C) No. 2831/2021, the petitioners were appointed as Junior Assistants, in terms of the said NRCP Service Regulations, 2014.
5. Briefly put, the case of the petitioners is that pursuant to advertisements issued in the year 2014 for engagement of various categories of contractual posts under the NRC Updation Project in the State of Assam, the petitioners had participated in the selection process and were engaged as Circle Project Supervisors, Junior Assistants and Helpers on contractual basis in different districts and circles of the State. Their engagements were governed by the NRCP Service Regulations, 2014, framed by the Government of Assam, which prescribe the method of selection, continuance and disengagement of contractual employees.
6. The engagements of the petitioners were pursuant to the notification dated 05.12.2013, issued by the Registrar General of India under Section 18 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, notifying the decision of the Central Government to update the NRC, 1951 in the State of Assam in accordance with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “Ci
Manager, Government Branch Press & Anr. Vs. D. B. Belliappa
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarathi & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nodha Ram & Ors.
MD, U.P Land Development Corporation & Anr. Vs. Amar Singh & Ors.
Contractual employees have no vested rights to employment continuity when the associated project is concluded, and termination is lawful if conducted per the contract terms.
Contractual employment for retired officials cannot exceed five years or age of 65, based on the governing policy.
Continuous and necessary service by contractual employees requires consideration for regularization, transcending mere contractual limitations, provided sanctioned posts exist.
Engagement on a contractual basis in project-specific roles does not confer rights to permanency, and long service cannot override express terms of engagement.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.