SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 210

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Miss Rushika Pathak, D/o. Sri Indra Pathak – Petitioner 
Versus
The Union of India, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors. – Respondents 
WP(C) No.136 of 2026
Decided On : 09-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R. Borah, Advocate
For the Respondents: Ms. S. Baruah, CGC

Height measurements for recruitment must adhere to rounding rules, preventing disqualification based on minor discrepancies and ensuring fair evaluation of candidates.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Process - Guidelines for Physical Standard Test - Clause 12.5.1 - Height requirements for Constable GD position in CAPFs - The petitioner was disqualified for having a height of 154.6 cm while the minimum for females is set at 157 cm, though a relaxation applies for candidates from Assam, allowing 155 cm. The court applied Clause 2(d) of the Guidelines dated 20.05.2015 stating that any height fraction of 0.5 cm or more should be rounded up to the next cm. The court referenced the previous case ruling that ignoring the rounding off rule leads to redundancy of relaxations - The court ordered the respondent authorities to reassess the petitioner's height as 155 cm for eligibility. (Paras 4-10)

(B) Legal Principles - The principle that height measurements should consider rounding up under the specified guidelines to avoid disqualification based on minor discrepancies was emphasized, reinforcing the notion of fair recruitment processes. (Paras 6-8)

(C)

Issues: The primary issue regards the appropriate measurement and application of height requirements for candidates, and whether the rounding rule is applicable during the Physical Standard Test phase. (Para 6)

(D)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that fractions over 0.5 cm must be rounded up as per established guidelines, which supports a fair interpretation of recruitment standards and avoids the exclusion of deserving candidates. (Para 8) (E)

Result: The court set aside the rejection of the petitioner’s application and directed the authorities to reconsider her for the position. (Para 10)

Table of Content
1. height requirements for recruitment. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. rounding off height measurements. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's directive regarding reconsideration. (Para 9 , 10)
4. final order and clarifications. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. R. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. S. Baruah, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the rejection of the petitioner’s candidature on the ground that the petitioner’s height is below the prescribed limit.

3. The facts of the instant case as is apparent from the materials on record is that in pursuance to a Notice dated 05.09.2024 for recruitment to the post of Constable GD in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) and SSF, Rifleman GD in Assam Rifles and Sepoy in Narcotics Control Bureau Examination-2025, the petitioner participated in the said recruitment process for the post of Constable GD.

4. It is very pertinent to take note of that Clause 12.5 of the Notice dated 05.09.2024 stipulates the Physical Standard Test (PST). The said Clause 12.5.1 deals with height, which being relevant, is reproduced herein under:-

12.5.1 Height:

12.5.1.1 Male: 170 cms

12.5.1.2 Female: 157 cms

12.5.1.3 Few categories of candidates are allowed relaxation in the heights mentioned above. Relaxed standard of height for such candidates are as follows:

S. No. Relaxation in Height to few categories of CandidateMale (Cms)Female (Cms)
(a)All candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribes.162.5150.0
(b)All Scheduled Tribe candidates of North Eastern States (NE States).157.0147.5
(c)All Scheduled Tribe candidates of Left-Wing Extremism affected districts.160.0 147.5
(d)Candidates falling in the categories of Garhwalis, Kumaonis, Dogras, Marathas and candidates belonging to the States/ UTs of Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.165.0 155.0
(e)Candidates hailing from the North-Eastern States of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura.162.5152.5
(f)Candidates hailing from Gorkha Territorial Administration (GTA) comprising of the three Sub-Divisions of Darjeeling District namely Darjeeling, Kalimpong and Kurseong and includes the following "Mouzas" Sub-Division of these Districts: - (1) Lohagarh Tea Garden (2) Lohagarh Forest (3) Rangmohan (4) Barachenga (5) Panighata (6) ChotaAdalpur (7) Paharu (8) Sukna Forest (9) Sukna Part-I (10) Pantapati Forest-I (11) Mahanadi Forest (12) Champasari Forest (13) SalbariChhatpart-II (14) Sitong Forest (15) Sivoke Hill Forest (16) Sivoke Forest (17) ChhotaChenga (18) Nipania.157.0152.5

5. From a perusal of the above quoted Clause, it would be seen that for female, the height is 157 cm in terms with Clause 12.5.1.2. However, there are certain relaxations for certain categories of candidates, e.g., if the candidate belongs to the State of Assam, the height for a female candidate is 155 cm. The petitioner's height was measured and it was found that the height of the petitioner was 154.6 cm, and as such, the petitioner was disqualified in the Physical Standard Test. It is under such circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that taking into account that the petitioner's height is 154.6 cm, in terms with the Uniform Guidelines for medical examination meant for recruitment in CAPF, NSG and AR, more particularly Clause 2(d), the height of the petitioner should have been rounded off to 155 cm in as much as the petitioner's height was 154.6 cm. In that regard, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner also referred to a judgment of the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Arup Ray vs. the Union of India & Others, WP(C) No.6436/2025 dated 02.12.2025 wherein also the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court held that in terms with Clause 2(d) of the Guidelines dated 20.05.2015, if the height fraction is of 0.5 cm and more

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top