Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Jitu Dutta son of Sri Bipul Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, represented by Public Prosecutor, Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA, J.
An order dated 18.12.2021 passed by the Assam State Commission for Women, whereby the petitioner is directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the respondent no.3 as maintenance, to be deducted every month from his account, is the subject matter of challenge in this petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. As per the facts projected, the petitioner is posted as Duftry at the Srimanta Sankardeva University of Health Science. The respondent no3, who is his estranged wife, had filed a case in the Assam State Commission for Women (hereinafter the Commission), which was registered as ASCW/53/2021. In the said case, vide the impugned order dated 18.12.2021, maintenance has been determined and directed to be paid by way of deduction from the monthly salary of the petitioner.
3. I have heard Shri S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Shri J. Handique, learned State Counsel. So far as respondent no. 3 is concerned, though notices have been served, she has chosen not to appear and contest this proceeding. In this connection, it would be relevant to place on record the earlier or
The Assam State Commission for Women lacks the jurisdiction to issue maintenance orders, which must be decided by appropriate legal forums according to applicable statutes.
The Assam State Commission for Women lacks jurisdiction to order maintenance payments as this function is not explicitly conferred by the Assam State Commission for Women Act, 1994.
The Assam State Commission for Women lacks jurisdiction to issue orders for maintenance, as its powers do not extend to adjudicating the rights of individuals under the relevant act.
The Sikkim State Commission for Women lacks the authority to adjudicate disputes, only able to receive complaints and recommend remedial measures.
The Manipur State Commission for Women has the power to entertain complaints and direct parties to appear for inquiry, but not to adjudicate or determine rights like a Court or Tribunal.
State Commission lacks adjudicatory authority; it cannot determine caste or tribe status of individuals or demand caste certificate production.
Writ petitions under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act cannot seek eviction; they only allow for maintenance enforcement, emphasizing the Act's protective nature for seni....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
