SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2326

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
Shamima Jahan, J.
Smti. Neitsolo-U Wife Of Shri. Neichulo Wezah – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Nagaland Through The Chief Secretary And Ors – Respondents
WP(C) 337 of 2022
Decided On : 18-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sentiyanger, Chuba Imchen, V Anne Therie, Konli Buchem, Jongpongsangba
For the Respondent: Mr. Moa Imchen, Senior G.A

Pensionary benefits cannot be denied to long-serving temporary employees based on arbitrary distinctions in pay structure, especially when long-term services have been fully utilized by the state, as such discrimination violates constitutional standards of reasonableness.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226 - Service Law - Regularization of work-charged employees - Pensionary benefits - Discrimination between employees based on pay structure - Work-charged employees performing similar duties as those on scale pay cannot be denied regularization without intelligible differentia - Denial of pensionary benefits after long service rendered in public interest is unreasonable and violative of constitutional provisions. (Paras 17, 18, 20, 24, 26)

(B) Service Law - Regularization - If a contract appointment continues uninterrupted till superannuation, the character of the appointment changes, entitling employees to terminal benefits. (Para 25)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner served as a work-charged laborer for thirty-five years. After retirement, the petitioner was denied pensionary benefits on the grounds that the petitioner did not receive scale pay under the relevant government office memorandum, despite others performing similar duties receiving such benefits.

Findings of Court:
The classification between employees based on pay scale without an intelligible differentia is arbitrary. The state cannot utilize long-term services for over three decades and release an employee without any terminal benefits.

Issues: Whether the exclusion of employees from regularization based on the lack of a specific pay scale constitutes unlawful discrimination and whether an employee with significant years of service is entitled to pensionary benefits despite a lack of formal regularization prior to retirement.

Ratio Decidendi: Any classification for the purpose of granting benefits must be based on real and substantial distinctions; arbitrary differentiations leading to the denial of pension after decades of service fail the test of reasonableness under constitutional mandates.

Result: Petition allowed; respondents directed to regularize the petitioner's service for pensionary purposes.

Table of Content
1. historical context and government policies regarding work-charged employee regularization. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. parties' contentions regarding article 14 violations and the validity of departmental memoranda. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. judicial assessment of reasonable classification and constitutional equality under article 14. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. welfare state's obligation to provide benefits after long-term continuous service. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. unjust discrimination regarding scale pay implementation among work-charged employees. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
6. order for retrospective regularization and entitlement to pensionary benefits. (Para 31 , 32)

ORDER :

SHAMIMA JAHAN, J.

This is an application preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of mandamus, for retrospective regularization of the petitioner’s service as Work Charged employee in the Office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, I/C, PWD (Housing), Phek, Nagaland for pension and pensionary benefits. The petitioner has also prayed for modification of the Office Memorandum No. AR-3/GEN-201/2009 dated 17.03.2015 by which it was provided that the employees who were enjoying scale pay and who have served for 30 years or more of continuous service as on 01.01.2015 will be regularized and not in respect of employees who do not have a scale pay.

FACTS

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Work Charged labour on fixed pay on 23.05.1986 and on being appointed, work charged Identity Card bearing No. 123 was issued to the petitioner and since then she was working continuously. On 05.05.2021, after completion of 35 years of service, the petitioner was released from her service vide order dated 05.05.2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (I/C), PWD (Housing), Phek, Nagaland with effect from 31.05.2021. The petitioner was released without any pension or pensionary benefits. Aggrieved with the non- payment of the pensionary benefits, the petitioner wrote a representation to the said authority on 20.07.2022 for retrospective regularization of her service for the purpose of pension which was not considered by the authority concerned till date.

3. The law relating to regularization and absorption of work charge and casual employees were initially governed by the Office Memorandum dated 22.09.2004 wherein it was provided as under:-

“(ii) Regularization of work-charged employees will be done against available regular vacancies.

(ii) 50% of all regular vacancies of similar nature arising in a year will be reserved for regularization of Work-Charged employees, and the remaining 50% will be filled up as per normal rules of recruitment.

(iii) Work-charged employees will have the right to be considered first for regularization against 50% of all future vacancies of similar nature in the Department for which they possess the requisite qualification.Such qualification will be considered on the basis of seniority-cum-merit. This means that the senior most work-charge employee in the relevant category will be regularized subject to his/her fitness to the vacant post."

4. Thereafter, the Govt. of Nagaland vide Memorandum dated 17.03.2015 formulated a new scheme for regularization and absorption of the work charge and casual employees as well as for revision of pay and wages. In the said Memorandum, it was provided that all work charged employees who enjoy scale pay and who have completed 30 years of service or more will be regularized. It was also provided that the quota for work charged employees for regularization against normal vacancy was enhanced from 50% to 67%. The said Memorandum is reproduced below:-

“(i) All existing work-charged and casual employees of various Departments who are enjoying scale pay and who have completed 30 (thirty) years or more continuous service as on 01-01-2015 will be regularized by conversion of their posts into regular ones personal to them and subject to fu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top