THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Aoicharjya Jibon Baruah, S/o. Apurba Jibon Baruah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Represented By The Additional Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. limitation of judicial review to non-compliance of inquiry act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. factual basis of the commission's inquiry into apsc anomalies. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 3. parties' contentions regarding section 8b and 8c violations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 4. commission violated statutory natural justice requirements under sections 8b/8c. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107) |
| 5. disciplinary proceedings restricted to independent evidence, excluding commission findings. (Para 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127) |
| 6. protracted suspension requires periodical review per public interest. (Para 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 1 |





Kehar Singh & Others Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Kiran Bedi & Others Vs. Committee of Inquiry & Another
State of Bihar Vs. Lal Krishna Advani & Others
Sanjay Gupta & Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India & Others
Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India (Through its Secretary) & Anr.
Point of law: Whenever an inquiring authority is to be appointed for conducting enquiry under the said rules, they are also requested to bring these instructions to the notice of their subordinates f....
Disciplinary action necessitates adherence to statutory rules, including providing a disagreement note when diverging from inquiry findings, as failure to do so violates principles of natural justice....
Procedural errors in disciplinary proceedings violated natural justice, requiring the quashing of penalties and remanding for fresh consideration.
The principles of natural justice require that a delinquent employee be given a copy of the preliminary enquiry report before the disciplinary authority arrives at its conclusions with regard to the ....
The Commission's failure to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard violated natural justice, rendering its findings invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.