A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Chi Commodities Handlers Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Ranjith Lal – Respondent
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.
1. These original petitions are arising from the orders passed by the District Court, Kollam rejecting preliminary objection raised by the petitioners on the maintainability of Original Petitions (Arbitration) filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the "Arbitration Act, 1996"). Since common questions of law are involved in all these original petitions, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The petitioners in all these original petitions are one and the same, namely, a Canadian entity, which has raised a claim against the respondents invoking Arbitration clause in accordance with the Arbitration procedure of the Association of Food Industries (Inc.) (for short, "AFI"). The relevant clause of Arbitration is as follows:
"Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract or breach thereof shall be settled by Arbitration in New York, NY, by the Association of food industries in Inc in accordance with its rules and judgment."
Accordingly, an Award has been passed in the matter by the Arbitrators of AFI.
3. The respondents, who are based at Kollam, filed the original petitions un
International Nut Alliance LLC v. Binu John [2014 (3) KLT 355]
Bharat Aluminium Company v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service (INC) [(2012) 9 SCC 552]
Videocon Industries Ltd. v. Union of India and another [(2011) 6 SCC 161]
Sakuma Exporters Limited v. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA [(2015) 5 SCC 656]
Reliance Industries Limited and Another v. Union of India [(2014) 7 SCC 603]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.