SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ker) 504

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
P. CHANDRAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI.LAL GEORGE, SMT.M.J.INDUJA
For the Respondent: SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN, SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR

JUDGMENT :

Ravikumar, J.

What is the impact of the amendment brought to Explanation-II to section 4(1)(b) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 by Amendment Act 46 of 2000 as relates the deemed monthly wages of a workman who met with an accident prior to its coming into force, in the matter of computation of the amount of compensation? The said question crops up for consideration in this appeal at the instance of the second opposite party in W.C.C.No.190/2000 on the files of the Court of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in the light of the following factual matrix:-

The applicant (first respondent herein) was working under the first party before the Commissioner as driver in lorry bearing Reg.No.KL/11/A/675. On 18.5.2000, during midnight, he was driving the said vehicle towards Bangalore and at about 2 a.m on 19.5.2000, when the lorry reached at Mandya, it went off the road from the highway and dashed against a tree standing on the road side, due to mechanical defect. He sustained severe injuries in the said accident. Ext.A1 would reveal that he sustained fracture U

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top