IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P.CHALY, JJ.
Shabeer Shajahan, S/o. N.A.Shajahan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C).No.23714 of 2019(L)
Decided on : 19-06-2020
Special Rules for Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001- Rule 5;; The Kerala Higher Secondary Education Subordinate State Service Rules;; The Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - chapter XXXII -Rule 6;; Rule 5 of Special Rules for Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001, the Kerala Higher Secondary Education Subordinate State Service Rules, and Rule 6 of chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 are not repugnant to Exhibit-P1 NCTE Regulations. Rules framed under the abovesaid Acts are valid.
Statement of facts:
Petitioner is a former Senate Member of Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam. He is also the member of Ward No.VIII of Athirampuzha Grama Panchayat and Vice-President of Muslim Students Federation, an active students' organization having representatives in the Students' Union committee, Union Council of University, Senate etc.-Filed this writ petition - To declare that Rule 5 of the Special Rules for Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001, to the extent it is inconsistent with National Council for Teacher Education (Determination or Minimum Qualifications for Persons to be recruited as Education Teachers and Physical Education Teachers in Pre-primary, Primary, Upper Primary, Secondary, Senior Secondary or Intermediate Schools or Colleges) Regulations, 2014 (Exhibit-P1) issued under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, is void.
(ii) To declare that Rule 5 of the Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001, to the extent it is inconsistent with Exhibit-P1 Regulations issued under the NCTE Act is void.
(iii) To declare that Rule 6 of Chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959, to the extent it is inconsistent with Exhibit-P1 regulations issued under the NCTE Act is void.
Finding of the court:
Rule 5 of Special Rules for Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001, the Kerala Higher Secondary Education Subordinate State Service Rules, and Rule 6 of chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 are not repugnant to Exhibit-P1 NCTE Regulations. Rules framed under the abovesaid Acts are valid.
Result: Writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
S.Manikumar, J.
Instant public interest writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
(ii) To declare that Rule 5 of the Kerala Higher Secondary Education State Service Rules, 2001, to the extent it is inconsistent with Exhibit-P1 Regulations issued under the NCTE Act is void.
(iii) To declare that Rule 6 of Chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959, to the extent it is inconsistent with Exhibit-P1 regulations issued under the NCTE Act is void.
(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the State of Kerala and the Director of General Education, Thiruvananthapuram, respondents 1 & 2, not to approve the appointment of candidates, who have not obtained B.Ed., or B.A.Ed/B.Sc.Ed. degree from NCTE recognized institution, as teachers in Higher Secondary Schools.
(v) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the State of Kerala and the Director of General Education, Thiruvananthapuram, respondents 1 & 2, not to appoint any candidate, who has not acquired B.Ed. Degree from an NCTE recognized institution as Higher Secondary School Teacher.
(vi) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the State of Kerala and the Director of General Education, Thiruvananthapuram, respondents 1 & 2 not to consider the certificate issued by any authority other than the National Council for Teacher Education granting equivalency to any training programme for the purpose of deciding the qualification of a candidate for the post of HSST and HSST (Junior).”
2. Short facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are that, - petitioner is a former Senate Member of Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam. He is also the member of Ward No.VIII of Athirampuzha Grama Panchayat and Vice-President of Muslim Students Federation, an active students' organization having representatives in the Students' Union committee, Union Council of University, Senate etc.
3. Parliament has enacted the National Council for Teachers' Education Act, 1993 ('NCTE Act', for short). Under the said Act, National Council for Technical Education, established under Section 3(1), is the only authority to prescribe minimum qualification for a person to be employed as a teacher in the schools or recognised institutions. As per National Council for Teacher Education (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Persons to be Recruited as Education Teachers and Physical Education Teachers in Pre-primary, Primary, Upper Primary, Secondary, Senior Secondary or Intermediate Schools or Colleges) Regulations, 2014 (Exhibit-P1) issued by the National Council for Teacher Education under the NCTE Act, which are applicable for recruitment of teachers in all the schools for imparting education to elementary, secondary and senior secondary stages, the minimum qualification prescribed for the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher (HSST) is Post Graduate (or its equivalent) degree from a recognized University, and B.Ed or B.A.Ed/B.Sc.Ed. from any NCTE recognized institution.
4. According to the petitioner, the qualifications for Higher Secondary School Teachers (HSST) in Government Schools in Kerala are prescribed in Rule 5 of the Special Ru
A.S. Krishna v. Madras State (AIR 1957 SC 297)
Association of Natural Gas v. Union of India reported in (2004) 4 SCC 489
A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. M. Venkatachalam Potti
A.S. Krishna v. Madras State (AIR 1957 SC 297)
Bondu Ramaswamy v. Bangalore Development Authority [(2010) 7 SCC 129
Ch. Tika Ramji and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. (1956 SCR 393
Deep Chand v. State of U.P. reported in AIR 1959 SC 648
Fatehchand Himmatlal v. State of Maharashtra reported in (1977) 2 SCC 670
Federation of Hotels and Restaurants v. Union of India (1989) 3 SCC 634
Girnar Traders v. State of Maharashtra reported in (2011) 3 SCC 1
Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1983) 3 SCR 130
Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar [(1983) 4 SCC 45
Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India [(1969) 2 SCC 166]
Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank and Ors. [(2018) 1 SCC 407
M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India (1979 3 SCR 254)
M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India reported in (1979) 3 SCC 431
Prafulla Kumar Mukherjee v. Bank of Commerce Ltd. (AIR 1947 PC 60)
Rajiv Sarin v. State of Uttarakhand reported in (2011) 8 SCC 708
State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. reported in (2004) 10 SCC 201
Shriram Chits and Investment (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch & Co. [ (1964) 4 SCR 461]
State of Bombay v. Narottamdas Jethabha (AIR 1951 SC 69)
T.S. Balliah v. T.S. Rangachari [(1969) 3 SCR 65]
T. Barai v. Henry Ah Hoe and Anr. (1983 1 SCC 177)
Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon [(1971) 2 SCC 779]
Union of India v. Shah Goverdhan L. Kabra Teachers’ College [(2002) 8 SCC 228]
Ujagar Prints v. Union of India [(1989) 3 SCC 488]
Vijay Kumar Sharma and Ors. Etc v. State of Karnataka (1990) 2 SCC 562
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.