Back
K. Manoj@Kadakampalli Manoj, S/o. Kuttappan, Kadakampallil Veedu – Appellant
Versus
Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam, Kollam Represented By Its General Secretary, V. K. Natesan – Respondent
ORDER :
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.77 of 2019 of Principal Munsiff Court, Kollam in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction are the revision petitioners. Respondents are the defendants before the court below.
2. The plaintiffs are the members of first defendant, Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam ('Yogam' in short), represented by its General Secretary, the second defendant. Other defendants are the representatives of the constituent unions of the yogam. The prayer sought in the suit was to permanently injunct the second defendant from convening, holding and conducting annual general meeting of the first defendant proposed to be held on 15.02.2019 or any other annual general meeting, for moving the amendments proposed in the notice produced along with the plaint. Along with the suit, an interim injunction in the above terms was sought, by filing I.A.No.562 of 2019. Defendants appeared and filed objections, inter alia, contending that, being a non trading company, in the light of the bar under the Companies Act, suit was not maintainable. Repelling the above objections, interim injunction as sought was granted by the learned Munsiff. This was challenged by the defendants 1 and 2
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
