S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY
G. Balagopalan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by The Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Manikumar, J.
Petitioner, a practicing advocate, has filed the instant public interest writ petition challenging G.O.(P) No.1/2019/GAD dated 31.01.2019, whereby permission was accorded to grant eligible/casual leave to the Government employees and teachers, who had not attended duties during nation-wide general strike. He has sought for the following reliefs:
(ii). To declare that permitting casual leave or other eligible leave to the State Government employees and teachers and to disburse salary after absenting from service of general strike against the Central Government is illegal and unconstitutional.
(iii). To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the respondents 1 to 3 to not to extend any kind of leave to the employees and teachers, who took part in the general strike by absenting themselves from duties by the issuance of Exhibit-P1 or other similar orders.”
2. Facts leading to the filing the writ petition are that, petitioner, a retired Director of Police, Finger Print Bureau
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra and Others
George Kurian v. State of Kerala
Harish Uppal v. Union of India
Indian National Congress (l) v. Institute of Social Welfare
K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Kerala Vyapari Vyavasayi Ekopana Samithi v. State of Kerala
Khoday Distilleries v. State of Karnataka
Kodungallur Film Society and Another v. Union of India and Others
M/s. Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd., Gorakhpore v. Shri Shibban Lal Saxena and Others
Neetu v. State of Punjab and Others
Rajnit Prasad v. Union of India and Others
Ram Singh Vijay Pal Singh v. State of U.P.
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan
State of Orissa and Ors. v. Gopinath Dash and Ors.
T.K.Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam v. Union of India
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla
Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh v. State of Andhra Pradesh
All India Bank Employees' Association v. National Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
Ashif Hamid v. State of J. & K.
Balco Employees' Union (Regd.) v. Union of India
Bharat Kumar v. State of Kerala
Chief Settlement Commissioner Punjab v. Om Prakash
Delhi Development Authority and Anr. v. Joint Action Committee Allottee of SFS Flats and Ors.
Directorate of Film Festivals and Others v. Gaurav Aswin Jain and Others
The wisdom and advisability of the policies are ordinarily not amenable to judicial review unless the policies are contrary to statutory or constitutional provisions or arbitrary or irrational or an ....
Government cannot issue orders that violate service rules prohibiting strikes, which undermines public interest principles and regulatory frameworks.
The court upheld that government policies safeguarding fishing rights for local cooperatives do not infringe constitutional rights if they are rational and promote social justice for the fishing comm....
The power of judicial review is a basic feature of the Constitution of India. It is for the executive to administer law and the function of the judiciary is to ensure that the Government carries out ....
Industrial dispute - If the employer is an instrumentality of the State, as per Article 12 of the Constitution of India, then they are bound to conform fully to the rigour discipline of the mandate c....
Point of Law : Since the appointment of the 7th respondent is made, creating a supernumerary post, there is no other option to the petitioner, than to approach this Court, by filing a writ petition s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.