Back
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
Gracy Varghese, W/o. Dr. K. P. Varghese – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The case of the petitioners is as follows:-
The petitioners are the absolute owners of the properties admeasuring 95.250 cents in Sy.No.78/5 and 28.660 cents in Sy.No.85/2 in Block No.17 in Kumbalam Village obtained by them as per Sale Deed No.513/2006 and 12.350 cents and 10 cents in Sy.No.78/6 in Block No.17 of the Kumbalam Village obtained as per Sale Deed Nos.1031/2010 and 5084/2005 respectively of the SRO, Maradu. Though the entire properties are lying as converted land, when the draft data bank was prepared, the properties in Sy.Nos.78/5 and 78/6 of the Kumbalam Village were mistakenly shown as 'nilam'. Also in the new data bank register prepared in the year 2013, the properties were wrongly described as 'nilam', though those were shown as 'purayidam' in the revenue records. On knowing about the mistake, the petitioners submitted Ext.P1 representation before the Local Level Monitoring Committee (for short 'LLMC') to conduct a site inspection and to correct the mistake in the data bank register. The inaction on the part of the fourth respondent constrained the petitioners to file WP(C) No.10985/2016 and as per Ext.P2 judgment dated 22.3.2016, this Court directed the L
Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 was issued by the Government of Kerala under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 at a time when India was facing food grain deficit and there were some restriction....
The court established that land classification and inclusion in the Land Data Bank determine the applicable legal framework for conversion and building permits.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering prior orders and relevant legal principles in evaluating land use under specific statutes.
The KLU Order must be sufficiently considered in decisions regarding land use applications.
The court established that erroneous entries in the land data bank must be rectified and that applications for land use should be reconsidered based on judicial precedents.
The classification of land based solely on waterlogging does not justify its designation as wetland, necessitating reconsideration of applications for land utilization.
The court affirmed that property reclassification is valid under government circulars where prior orders exist, ensuring benefits extend to affected parties.
Timely decision-making on land conversion applications under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order is essential, reinforced by the Local Level Monitoring Committee's findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
