IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
JAYAPRAKASH K.K. S/O LATE KESAVAN – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 26397 of 2022
Decided On : 19-08-2022
Constitution, 1950 - Article 226 - Right to Information Act, 2005 - Section 7(1), 19, 7, 7(2) - Appeal - Disposal of request - Power of High court to issue writs - Whether statutory right of appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005 is rendered inefficacious in absence of a formal order on request for information is the question posed for consideration in this writ petition - Whether statutory right of appeal under Right to Information Act, 2005 is rendered inefficacious in absence of a formal order on request for information is question posed for consideration in this writ petition - Section 7(2) provides that, if PIO fails to give a decision on request for information within time frame provided under Section 7(1) of RTI Act, said officer shall be deemed to have refused request.
Findings of the Court:
Case of petitioner is that PIO has failed to give decision on request for information within period specified. If so, there is deemed refusal of request for information. The petitioner has to invoke provisions under Section 19(1) of RTI Act and writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution is not maintainable.
Result: Writ Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
1. Whether the statutory right of appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the RTI Act’) is rendered inefficacious in the absence of a formal order on the request for information is the question posed for consideration in this writ petition.
2. The petitioner made Ext.P1 request for information under the RTI Act before the 3rd respondent Public Information Officer (‘PIO’ for short). The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after remitting the required fee, the request for information is not disposed of by the PIO within the time stipulated under the RTI Act. The petitioner has, accordingly, preferred this writ petition for the following reliefs:
(b) issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent herein to act upon Exhibit P1 in a time bound manner and in accordance with law.
(c) issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent herein to pay the petitioner penalty as envisaged under section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 computed from 21.03.2022 and in accordance with law.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3.
4. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent, who is the PIO, is bound to dispose of Ext.P1 request, within the period specified under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act. The petitioner submits that, since the PIO has not passed an ‘order’ refusing his request, he is unable to avail his statutory right of appeal provided under Section 19 of the RTI Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Black’s Law Dictionary and submits that, the word “refuse” involves ‘an act of the will’ and there shall be formal order refusing the request to invoke the appellate remedy.
5. Section 7 of the RTI Act deals with ‘disposal of request’ and Section 7(1) reads as follows:
Provided that where the information sought for concerns the life or liberty of a person, the same shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request.
Section 7(2) of the RTI Act reads thus:
S.7(2): If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request.
6. Section 19 of the RTI Act deals with ‘appeal’ and Section 19 (1) reads as under:
The RTI Act also provides for second appeal to the State Information Commission.
7. Section 7 (1) of the RTI Act provides for disposal of request for information within thirty days of receipt of the request either by providing the information
Section 7(1) of RTI Act provides for disposal of request for information within thirty days of receipt of request either by providing information or by rejecting request.
The Court emphasizes the timely disposal of appeal petitions under the Right to Information Act, 2005, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.