IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Mohammed Nias C.P., JJ.
Union of India Represented By Its General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Pavithran K, S/o. Vellan and Ors. – Respondents
O.P.(CAT).No. 111, 61, 64, 66, 67, 90, 92, 95, 98, 107, 154, 187, 213, 214 & 216 of 2020
Decided On : 22-11-2022
Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rules 3, 5, 14, 33 and 34 - Emoluments - Average Emoluments - Age of superannuation - Regulation of claims to pension or family pension - Conditions subject to which service qualifies - Respondents/applicants retired from their respective establishments on attaining the age of superannuation. Their next annual increment, had they continued in service, would have accrued to them on the very next day. When their claim for reckoning the said increment along with their last drawn pay for the purposes of their retirement benefits did not yield a favourable response from the Government, they approached the Central Administrative Tribunal through the applications that were disposed by the impugned orders of the Tribunal - Whether a Government servant who retires on the last working day of the preceding month and whose annual increment falls due on the first of the succeeding month is entitled for sanction of annual increment for the purposes of pension and gratuity - Rule 83 of Pension Rules postulates that pension shall become payable from date on which a Government servant ceases to be borne on establishment. That only means a Government servant gets status of pensioner from next day after date of retirement i.e., last day of month on which he is retired. (Para 29).
Findings of the Court: Court is of view that the issue of whether a Government servant who retired on the last working day of the preceding month and whose annual increment falls due on the first of the succeeding month is entitled for sanction of annual increment for the purpose of pension and gratuity must be answered in favour of the petitioners herein and against the respondents. Court do so by setting aside the impugned orders of the Tribunal and allowing these O.P.(CAT)'s.
Result: O.P allowed.
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
The short issue that arises for consideration in these O.P.(CAT)'s is whether a Government servant who retires on the last working day of the preceding month and whose annual increment falls due on the first of the succeeding month is entitled for sanction of annual increment for the purposes of pension and gratuity ? This being the sole issue on which the O.P.(CAT)'s have been preferred by the Union of India, we do not deem it necessary to record the factual circumstances arising in the individual cases.
2. Briefly stated, the facts that are common to all the cases are that the respondents/applicants retired from their respective establishments on attaining the age of superannuation. Their next annual increment, had they continued in service, would have accrued to them on the very next day. When their claim for reckoning the said increment along with their last drawn pay for the purposes of their retirement benefits did not yield a favourable response from the Government, they approached the Central Administrative Tribunal through the applications that were disposed by the impugned orders of the Tribunal.
3. The Tribunal essentially followed the judgment of the Madras High Court in P.Ayyamperumal v. Union of India and others - [judgment dated 15.9.2017 in W.P.(C).No.15732/2017], the Special Leave Petition [SLP] against which was dismissed by the Supreme Court, to find that the respondents were entitled to the grant of annual increment on their completion of one full year of service at the time of their retirement for the purposes of pensionary benefits. It is impugning the said finding of the Tribunal that the petitioners are before us in these O.P.(CAT)'s.
4. We have heard Sri.Manu.S., the Deputy Solicitor General of India, Sri.T.V. Vinu, the learned Central Government Counsel as also Sri.K.I.Mayankutty Mather, the learned counsel for the petitioners in these O.P.(CAT)'s and Sri.Martin G. Thottan, Sri. C.S. Gopalakrishnan Nair and Sri. Saiby Jose Kidangoor, the learned counsel for the respondents in all these O.P.(CAT)'s.
5. At the outset, we deem it apposite to notice the Rules governing the issue, namely, the Fundamental Rules [F.R. 17, F.R. 24, F.R. 56(a) and the 1st proviso to F.R. 56(a)] and Rules 3, 5, 14, 33 and 34 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, which read as follows:-
“F.R. 17. (1) Subject to any exceptions specifically made in these rules and to the provision of sub-rule (2), an officer shall begin to draw the pay and allowances attached to his tenure of a post with effect from the date when he assumes the duties of that post, and shall cease to draw them as soon as he ceases to discharge those duties.
F.R. 24. An increment shall ordinarily be drawn as a matter of course unless it is withheld. An increment may be withheld form a Government servant by the Central Government or by any authority to whom the Central Government may delegate this power under Rule 6, if his conduct has not been good or his work has not been satisfactory. In ordering the withholding of an increment, the withholding authority shall state the period for which it is with held, and whether the post-ponement shall have the effect of postponing future increments.
F.R. 56(a). Except as otherwise provided in this rule, every Government servant shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of sixty years:
Provided that a Government servant whose date of birth is the first of a month shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the preceding month on attaining the age of sixty years.”
Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules
“Rule 3
Clauses 1(b) (e) and (q)
1(b) 'Average Emoluments' means average emoluments as determined in accordance with Rule 34;
1(e) 'Emoluments' means emoluments as defined in Rule 33;
1(q) 'Qualifying Service' means service rendered while on duty or otherwise which shall be taken into account for the purpose of pension and
A Government servant, as per Rule 35, shall be granted superannuation pension on his attaining age of compulsory retirement. Such Government servant shall be paid pension based on qualifying service ....
Point of Law : Rule 10 deals with date on which an annual increment is payable to employee.
Government servants are entitled to increments becoming payable on 1st July even after retirement, and denying a government servant the benefit of annual increment which he has already earned while r....
Employees entitled to notional increment earned before retirement despite accruing post-retirement, based on satisfactory prior service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct, and any....
Point of law: The expression 'emoluments' means basic pay as defined in Rule 9(21) (a)(i) of the Fundamental Rules which a Government servant was receiving immediately before his retirement or on the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that government servants are entitled to annual increment becoming payable on the succeeding day, even after retirement, and denying this entitleme....
The entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and becomes payable on the succeeding day, and denying a governme....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to receive increment crystallizes when the government servant completes requisite length of service with good conduct and beco....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.