P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN
Secretary Corporate Management of Schools under the Society of the Order of Sacred Transfiguration Pathanapuram, Kollam – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
1. Short point to be decided in this case is whether a claimant under Rule 43 of Chapter XIV (A) of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as “KER”) is entitled a preferencial appointment in super-session to an executive order passed by the Government as per G.O. (P) No. 10/10/G.Edn dated 12.01.2010 (in short “G.O. (P) 10/10”).
2. The 1st petitioner is the Corporate Management having several schools in different districts of the State, which is conferred with minority status by the National Commission for Minority Institutions of Government of India as per Ext.P1 order. The 2nd petitioner, Ms. Jolly Alex, was appointed as the Upper Primary School Assistant (in short “UPSA”) by the 1st petitioner with effect from 16.11.1989. The said appointment was approved by the department from the actual date of appointment. The 2nd petitioner, after her approval of appointment, worked in different schools under the 1st petitioner's management and was working at St. Stephen's High School, Pathanapuram till her promotion. The 1st petitioner promoted the 2nd petitioner as High School Assistant (Natural Science) [in short “HSA(NS)”] and posted her t
Unni Narayanan K. and Others vs. State of Kerala and Others
State of West Bengal and Another vs. Madan Mohan Ghosh and Others
Moosakutty Pothuvalappan vs. District Educational Officer, Wandoor and Others
Right of a teacher under Rule 43 Chapter XIV (A) KER cannot be infringed by state through an executive order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that promotions are to be made from persons possessing the prescribed qualifications at the time of occurrence of the vacancy, and the interpretati....
Promotion eligibility requires the satisfaction of qualifications at the time of vacancy, with amendments to rules applied retrospectively when appropriate.
Point of Law : Rule 8 of Chapter XIVA KER which deals with procedure with respect to approval of appointments.
The court affirmed deemed approval for teacher appointments due to the respondent's failure to act within legal timelines and ruled that objections for rejection were legally invalid.
The provisions of the Kerala Education Rules govern appointments, and while familial claims exist, they do not override statutory norms for educational appointments.
Rule 44 reads as appointment of Headmasters shall ordinarily be according to seniority from the seniority list prepared.
The right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right, and delay or laches in approaching the court/Tribunal may not always be considered as fatal to the legitimate claim of the aggrieved p....
Right to preferential appointment envisaged therein accrues only to a teacher who has been “relieved” in any of the circumstances mentioned in the Rule.
The lack of a vacancy in a specific teaching subject in the Higher Secondary section does not disqualify an eligible Headmaster from appointment by transfer as Principal under the Kerala Education Ru....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.