SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J.
Jamshid. P.V – Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala Represented By the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 834 OF 2023
Decided On : 24-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J.R.Prem Navaz, Sumeen S., Muhammed Swadiq
For the Respondent: Sri.P G Manu, Sr.Public Prosecutor

Point of Law : Truth of allegations should be evaluated from materials and attending circumstances to separate grain from chaff.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 341, 323, 354 and 294(b) - Kerala Healthcare Service Persons and Healthcare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Act, 2012 - Sections 3 and 4 - Application for anticipatory bail – Threat against doctors would be detrimental to interest of people at large - Para 8.

Finding of the Court :

If a patient, who wants treatment, is aggrieved in matter of touch on body of petitioner as part of examination, it is difficult for a doctor to do his medical profession by resorting to clinical examination - Attack against doctor at instance of petitioner is well made out and in such a case, if petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, it would lead to a very dangerous situation, thereby, doctors, who are duty bound to treat patients as part of their oath, will not get protection and if so, proper maintenance of health of public at large would be in peril - In such case, arrest and custodial interrogation are absolutely necessary to accomplish successful investigation and eventful prosecution - Grant of anticipatory bail, when prima facie offences are made out, would not only spoil investigation but would lead to traumatic situation.

Result : Bail application dismissed.

ORDER :

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the petitioner who is arrayed as accused in Crime No.19 of 2023 of Chalissery Police Station, Palakkad where, he alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 3 and 4 of the Kerala Healthcare Service Persons and Healthcare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Act, 2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. I have perused the Case Diary materials produced by the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The case of the prosecution is that, at about 18.50 hours on 08.01.2023, when the petitioner, who is a doctor by profession, was doing on-call duty, he had examined the wife of the accused aged 27 years at casualty attached to Star Med Family Clinic, Karukaputhoor. While so, the accused herein caught hold on his collar and slapped on his left cheek on the allegation that the defacto complainant touched on the body of the wife of the accused. On that premise, the prosecution alleges commission of the above offences.

5. While pursuing the relief of pre-arrest bail, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the petitioner is innocent. According to the learned counsel, the doctor misbehaved towards the wife of the accused and for which, complaint was lodged by the wife of the accused and crime alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC also was registered and is on investigation.

6. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and the allegations are false. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, this case was registered as a counterblast to avoid legal consequence, which would arise out of the case lodged by the wife of the accused.

7. Whereas the learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed bail, on the submission that, the petitioner herein, who is having criminal antecedents and involvement in four crimes, manhandled the defacto complainant and obstructed his duty, while doctor was examining his wife, on the allegation that, the doctor had touched on her body, as part of examination.

8. According to the learned Public Prosecutor, now attack against doctors are on high alarm and therefore, doctors are under threat and fear, apprehending their implication in crimes, while they will be doing their duty by examining the patients by way of clinical examinations. Therefore, threat against doctors would be detrimental to the interest of people at large. Thus it is submitted that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail, where prosecution allegations are well made out.

9. I have perused the First Information Statement given by the doctor where from this crime was registered along with the statement given by the Pharmacy Assistant as well as Administrative Assistant of Star Med Family Clinic where, the occurrence was reported. That apart, one Rakhi also given statement in support of the occurrence.

10. In this matter, the FIS was lodged at 11.30 hours on 09.01.2023 and crime was registered accordingly alleging commission of the above offences. It is true that a counter case also was registered after registration of this crime.

11. On perusal of the case records along with the scene mahazar and the statements of the witnesses, the prosecution case is well made out. Be it so, the allegation of misbehaviour at the option of the doctor, that has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, alleged to be committed in the presence of two sisters and in an open space at the casualty of the hospital cannot be believed prima facie. It is relevant to note further that the allegation of misbehaviour was raised, after registration of this crime.

12. In this matter, it is reported by the Investigating Officer that the petitioner is a person having criminal antecedents and he h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top