SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 132

S. MANIKUMAR, MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
S. HEMACHANDRAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: V. TEKCHAND.

JUDGMENT :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the directions issued by the Kerala Lok Ayukta dated 19.03.2014 in complaint No. 885 of 2013, Special Secretary to the Government, General Education Department, Thiruvananthapuram, has filed the instant writ petition for the following reliefs:

    “(i) Call for the records leading to Exhibit P1 order of the Hon’ble Lok Ayukta and quash the same.

(ii) Issue such orders to set aside Exhibit P1 order of the Hon’ble Lok Ayukta.

(iii) To declare that the petitioner had not caused any delay in disbursal of DCRG of the first respondent, over and above, time prescribed under the Service Rules entitling the petitioner to pay compensation by way of damages or interest.”

2. Short facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as under:

    2.1. Petitioner is highly aggrieved by Ext. P1 order of the Lok Ayukta, directing the Government to pay the damages by way of interest on the gratuity amount @ 10% per annum for the period from 13.01.2013 to 13.06.2013, and subsequently giving liberty to fix the responsibility for the delay, and to recover the amount from the officers concerned, who are responsible for the delay in issuing NLC.

2.2. Petitioner has sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top