IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
Suo Motu – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government and Ors. - Respondents
SSCR No.29 of 2022, W.P.(C) No.42987 of 2022
Decided On : 23-03-2023
Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Section 71 - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 – Section 15A, 24, 31 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Parking contract - Delay in payment of balance bid - Report relates to parking facility for Sabarimala pilgrims at Base Camp – Travancore Devaswom Board and its officials are directed to ensure strict compliance of directions - Para 45.
Finding of the Court: Inability of parking contractor to pay amounts together with penal interest stands admitted in affidavit, he cannot invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of Inda, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding Board and its officials not to terminate Ext.P1 contract entered into with 3rd respondent-Executive Officer, only on ground of delay in payment of balance bid amount - Court is of opinion that a thorough enquiry by a team constituted by Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau is absolutely essential on conduct of each and every person connected with auction conducted by Travancore Devaswom Board, in terms tender notification, of Kuthaka rights in Sabarimala Devaswom for year - In terms tender notification of Kuthaka rights in Sabarimala Devaswom for year 1198 ME (2022-23), to ascertain whether a cognizable offence is disclosed or not - If at any stage, during enquiry, there are reasonable grounds to believe that a public servant has committed an offence under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, further proceedings shall be taken in accordance with law - Travancore Devaswom Board and its officials are directed to ensure strict compliance of directions contained in decisions of this Court.
Result: W.P dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
[Anil K. Narendran, J.]
1. SSCR No.29 of 2022:- This report filed by the Special Commissioner, Sabarimala, in terms of the directions contained in the order of this Court dated 16.12.2022 in SSCR No.23 of 2022 and connected cases, relates to the parking facility for Sabarimala pilgrims at the Nilakkal Base Camp. The 9th respondent is the Kuthaka holder for collecting parking fee in the parking grounds at Nilakkal Base Camp, for the year 1198 ME (2022-23).
1.1. On 17.12.2022, when this report came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader entered appearance for respondents 1, 4 to 8 and the additional 10th respondent. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board entered appearance for respondents 2 and 3. Notice was ordered to the 9th respondent-contractor, through the additional 10th respondent Station House Officer or through the concerned Station House Officer at his place of residence.
1.2. On 19.12.2022, when this SSCR came up for consideration at 10.15 a.m., the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board submitted that the 9th respondent-contractor has engaged 46 employees for regulating the parking of vehicles in 16 parking grounds at Nilakkal Base Camp. The learned counsel, who entered appearance for the 9th respondent-contractor, sought time to get instructions and therefore, the matter was ordered to be listed at 3.30 p.m. When the matter was taken up again at 3.30 p.m., the 5th respondent-District Police Chief filed a statement, stating that a meeting was convened on 16.12.2022 with the Special Officer/ Assistant Engineer, Nilakkal and also the 9th respondent-contractor, regarding the expansion of the parking capacity. The parking grounds were visited and it was noticed that some areas require compaction, laying of quarry waste, clearing of grass, etc. Action was taken to clear the ground neighbouring to Ground No.5 and it was designated as Ground No.5A, which has the capacity to hold 80-100 light motor vehicles. The Special Officer/Assistant Engineer, Nilakkal was directed to ensure sufficient lighting in the parking areas, where expansion has taken place. Some of the parking grounds covered with mud and sludge are being restored by soil compaction to enhance the holding capacity. The learned Senior Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that there are no issues in the parking grounds at Nilakkal. The learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, submitted that steps are being taken to provide parking space for additional 600 vehicles. By the order dated 19.12.2022, this Court directed the Board and its officials to ensure that the works undertaken for providing additional parking space in the parking grounds at Nilakkal are completed on a war footing.
1.3. The 9th respondent-contractor has filed an affidavit dated 20.12.2022, producing therewith Annexure R9(a) photographs of the parking grounds at Nilakkal Base Camp. On 22.12.2022, when this matter came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board and also the learned Amicus Curiae for the Special Commissioner, Sabarimala submitted that there are no issues in the parking grounds at Nilakkal Base Camp. The learned Standing Counsel sought time to get instructions as to whether there is periodical cleaning in the parking grounds at Nilakkal, to remove plastic cans, flower garlands, etc. By the order dated 22.12.2022, the learned Standing Counsel for the Board was directed to make available for the perusal of this Court, a copy of the contract entered into between the Board and the 9th respondent-contractor, for the year 1198 ME (2022-23).
1.4. On 23.12.2022, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board has made available for the perusal of this Court a copy of the contract dated 10.11.2022, entered into between the Board and the 9th respondent-contractor, which provides for vario
Prestige Lights Limited v. State Bank of India
Usha Nanthini v. Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad
Rajani P. Kuttan v. State of Kerala
M.V. Ramasubbiar v. Manicka Narasimachara
Travancore Devaswom Board v. Mohanan Nair
Alteration of circumstances does not lead to frustration of contract and that doctrine of frustration has to be applied narrowly.
The successful bidder must comply with auction tender conditions, including timely payments; failure results in losses to the Board and re-auction rights being exercised.
No person with criminal antecedents or persons who have not obtained Police Clearance Certificate shall be permitted in any stall in the premises of the temples under the management of the 1st respon....
Section 71 of Act deals with power of Government to declare Act applicable to any institution.
Any public auction of the right to open temporary shops/stalls in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple temple and also in the Kovil Padam Road owned by Devaswom can be cond....
The Travancore Devaswom Board must verify credentials of officers before postings to ensure integrity and proper management of religious institutions.
The nature of the fiduciary position of the trustee and his duties and obligations. It is duty of the trustees of the property to be faithful to the Trust and execute any document with reasonable dil....
Trustees of religious institutions must adhere to fiduciary duties and statutory guidelines to safeguard temple funds and avoid conflicts of interest.
Devaswom Boards are trustees with a legal obligation to protect and manage the properties of the Devaswoms, and failure to do so constitutes a breach of trust.
Violation of tender conditions by the kuthaka holder requires corrective actions from the Board, emphasizing strict adherence to established guidelines.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.